BACKGROUND: High-dose busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both adults and children. Large interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics after oral administration has been reported; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan may decrease the incidence of drug-related toxicity (for example, hepatic venoocclusive disease) and may also improve therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: Busulfan concentrations were quantified using 200 microL of plasma and liquid-liquid extraction with diethyl ether after the addition of [2H8]busulfan as the internal standard. Separation and detection of busulfan and [2H8]busulfan were achieved with a LUNA C8 column (5 microm; 150 x 2 mm i.d.) at 30 degrees C, a HP 1100 liquid chromatography system, and a HP 1100 single-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Busulfan and [2H8]busulfan were detected as ammonium adducts in selected-ion monitoring mode at m/z 264.2 and 272.2, respectively. RESULTS: The calibration curve was linear at 5-2000 microg/L busulfan. Intra- and interassay imprecision (CV) and bias were both <11%. The limits of detection and quantification were 2 and 5 microg/L, respectively. Extraction recovery of busulfan was >87%. Analysis of pharmacokinetics in four patients receiving high-dose busulfan indicated that minimum busulfan concentrations before the next dose were 405-603 microg/L, with no interference observed. CONCLUSIONS: The new rapid and sensitive liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay is an appropriate method for quantification of busulfan in human plasma, making therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan faster and easier in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: High-dose busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both adults and children. Large interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics after oral administration has been reported; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan may decrease the incidence of drug-related toxicity (for example, hepatic venoocclusive disease) and may also improve therapeutic efficacy. METHODS:Busulfan concentrations were quantified using 200 microL of plasma and liquid-liquid extraction with diethyl ether after the addition of [2H8]busulfan as the internal standard. Separation and detection of busulfan and [2H8]busulfan were achieved with a LUNA C8 column (5 microm; 150 x 2 mm i.d.) at 30 degrees C, a HP 1100 liquid chromatography system, and a HP 1100 single-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Busulfan and [2H8]busulfan were detected as ammonium adducts in selected-ion monitoring mode at m/z 264.2 and 272.2, respectively. RESULTS: The calibration curve was linear at 5-2000 microg/L busulfan. Intra- and interassay imprecision (CV) and bias were both <11%. The limits of detection and quantification were 2 and 5 microg/L, respectively. Extraction recovery of busulfan was >87%. Analysis of pharmacokinetics in four patients receiving high-dose busulfan indicated that minimum busulfan concentrations before the next dose were 405-603 microg/L, with no interference observed. CONCLUSIONS: The new rapid and sensitive liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay is an appropriate method for quantification of busulfan in human plasma, making therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan faster and easier in clinical practice.
Authors: Arthur J L Cooper; Islam R Younis; Zoya V Niatsetskaya; Boris F Krasnikov; John T Pinto; William P Petros; Patrick S Callery Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Soo Young Moon; Min Kyoo Lim; Susie Hong; Yongbum Jeon; Minje Han; Sang Hoon Song; Kyoung Soo Lim; Kyung-Sang Yu; In-Jin Jang; Ji Won Lee; Hyoung Jin Kang; Junghan Song Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Mary Rose Hilaire; Regina V Gill; Jodi B Courtney; Irina Baburina; JoAnn Gardiner; Michael C Milone; Leslie M Shaw; Qing H Meng; Salvatore J Salamone Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.681