Literature DB >> 11467642

The relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and socioeconomic variables.

C N Bernstein1, A Kraut, J F Blanchard, P Rawsthorne, N Yu, R Walld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic diseases associated with considerable morbidity. This morbidity may have an impact on the ability of patients to remain employed, on their marital status, and on their ability to complete a course of higher education. It has long been held that IBD patients are of a higher socioeconomic status and more educated than the general population. Our aim was to determine the relationship between IBD and employment, income, disability, education, and marital status in two population-based data sets based in the province of Manitoba, Canada.
METHODS: Two studies are reported here. In study A, we surveyed persons with IBD, using the population-based University of Manitoba IBD Database, created in 1995-1996. We compared these IBD patients to the general population with respect to employment, education, and marital status using data from the 1996 National Population Health Survey. IBD patients were queried as to their socioeconomic status as of the time of diagnosis and also at the time of the survey (1995-1996). In study B, we used a database that linked health care and census variables to determine differences in employment, income, occupation, and marital status among individuals who met the administrative definition of IBD (created in forming the University of Manitoba IBD Database, based on ICD-9-CM codes 555 for Crohn's disease and 556 for ulcerative colitis) compared with the rest of working-age population.
RESULTS: In study A we found that, compared with the general population, patients with IBD were more likely to be unemployed. Crohn's disease appeared to affect employment more than ulcerative colitis. IBD patients, however, had a low rate of reporting themselves as disabled (1.3%). Among those married when diagnosed with IBD, approximately 10% of men and up to 20% of women were no longer married 5 yr later. More patients with IBD were married in 1995 compared with the general population; however, more were also divorced. Fewer patients with IBD achieved postsecondary education. In study B, we found that individuals with IBD were twice as likely to be out of the labor force as were controls. Sedentary occupations were twice as likely to be associated with IBD. The income, education level, and marital status of IBD patients were not significantly different from those of controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with IBD at some time in the course of their illness are more likely not to be working than are those in the general population. Based on employment status and job classification, as well as income and education, IBD patients are not of a higher socioeconomic status as previously reported. IBD patients are at least as likely as the general population to be married.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11467642     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03946.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  32 in total

1.  Working more productively: tools for administrative data.

Authors:  Leslie L Roos; Ruth-Ann Soodeen; Ruth Bond; Charles Burchill
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comprehensive evaluation of canonical versus Dicer-substrate siRNA in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Donald J Foster; Scott Barros; Rick Duncan; Sarfraz Shaikh; William Cantley; Amy Dell; Elena Bulgakova; Jonathan O'Shea; Nate Taneja; Satya Kuchimanchi; Christopher B Sherrill; Akin Akinc; Gregory Hinkle; Amy C Seila White; Bo Pang; Klaus Charisse; Rachel Meyers; Muthiah Manoharan; Sayda M Elbashir
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 3.  Systematic review: The role of race and socioeconomic factors on IBD healthcare delivery and effectiveness.

Authors:  Justin L Sewell; Fernando S Velayos
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.325

4.  IBD-related work disability in the community: Prevalence, severity and predictive factors. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alexis Ramos; Xavier Calvet; Beatriz Sicilia; Mercedes Vergara; Ariadna Figuerola; Jaume Motos; Adoración Sastre; Albert Villoria; Fernando Gomollón
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Hygiene hypothesis in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha-A Koloski; Laurel Bret; Graham Radford-Smith
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Capsule endoscopy in suspected small bowel Crohn's disease: economic impact of disease diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan A Leighton; Ian M Gralnek; Randel E Richner; Michael J Lacey; Frank J Papatheofanis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms in adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Anu E Castaneda; Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson; Eeva T Aronen; Mauri Marttunen; Kaija-Leena Kolho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Mechanisms of Quality of Life and Social Support in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Laura Katz; Dean A Tripp; Mark Ropeleski; William Depew; J Curtis Nickel; Stephen Vanner; Michael J Beyak
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2016-03

10.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases in two British national birth cohorts.

Authors:  A G C Ehlin; S M Montgomery; A Ekbom; R E Pounder; A J Wakefield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.