Literature DB >> 11467502

Modulation of sucrose response thresholds in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): influence of genotype, feeding, and foraging experience.

T Pankiw1, K D Waddington, R E Page.   

Abstract

The perception of sugar is important to honey bees for making foraging decisions. We measured bees' perception by determining what concentration of sucrose touched to the antennae elicited the proboscis extension response (response threshold). A low response threshold (extension at low concentration) suggests a high perceptual value of sucrose. and vice versa. Perception of sucrose solutions differed between two artificially selected genotypic strains and was modulated by the bees' recent feeding experiences. Bees offered 10%, 30%, or 50% sucrose solutions in small cages overnight, and in large flight-cages or free-flying in the field for several days, had subsequent response thresholds positively correlated to the concentration offered. Empty bees, whether they were nectar, water or pollen foragers, dancers or non-dancers, had a significantly lower threshold than loaded bees. Crop volume affected response thresholds directly and independently of sucrose concentration. We interpret these findings as multiple mechanisms that operate in different time scales, modulating perception of sucrose. Changes occurred in the time scale of evolutionary processes as demonstrated by genotypic differences. Changes with foraging experience occur in hours or minutes while effects of crop filling are instantaneous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11467502     DOI: 10.1007/s003590100201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  28 in total

1.  Nectar loads as fuel for collecting nectar and pollen in honeybees: adjustment by sugar concentration.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Harano; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Genetics of reproduction and regulation of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) social behavior.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Olav Rueppell; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Biogenic amines are associated with worker task but not patriline in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior.

Authors:  Adam R Smith; Mario L Muscedere; Marc A Seid; James F A Traniello; William O H Hughes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Quantitative peptidomics reveal brain peptide signatures of behavior.

Authors:  Axel Brockmann; Suresh P Annangudi; Timothy A Richmond; Seth A Ament; Fang Xie; Bruce R Southey; Sandra R Rodriguez-Zas; Gene E Robinson; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The influence of gustatory and olfactory experiences on responsiveness to reward in the honeybee.

Authors:  Gabriela P Ramírez; Andrés S Martínez; Vanesa M Fernández; Gonzalo Corti Bielsa; Walter M Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The genetic basis of transgressive ovary size in honeybee workers.

Authors:  Timothy A Linksvayer; Olav Rueppell; Adam Siegel; Osman Kaftanoglu; Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Pheromonal regulation of starvation resistance in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Patrick Fischer; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-04-15

9.  Reappraising social insect behavior through aversive responsiveness and learning.

Authors:  Edith Roussel; Julie Carcaud; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effects of young brood on the foraging behavior of two strains of honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Robert E Page
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.