UNLABELLED: Intra-atrial conduction block within the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus (IVCT) has been shown to predict successful common atrial flutter ablation. However, its demonstration requires the use of several electrode catheters and mapping of the line of block. The aim of this study was prospectively to test the feasibility of a simplified ablation procedure using only two catheters. METHODS: Radio frequency (RF) ablation of common atrial flutter was performed in 30 patients with the sole use of a catheter for atrial pacing and a RF catheter. RF ablation lesions were created in the IVCT. Surface ECG criteria were used to monitor the conduction within the IVCT. The end point during low lateral atrial pacing was an increment in the interval between the pacing artefact and the peak of the R wave in surface lead II >50 ms and clockwise rotation of the P wave axis beyond -30 degrees and inferiorly. Then, the line of lesions was mapped during atrial pacing with the RF catheter. Additional RF lesions were applied if mapping disclosed a zone of residual conduction. Otherwise the procedure was stopped if mapping showed parallel double potentials all along the line. Finally, the block was reassessed with a 'Halo' catheter. RESULTS: Surface ECG criteria were met in 26 patients. Mapping the line of lesions showed a complete corridor of parallel double potentials in these 26 cases and in 3 of the 4 patients in whom ECG criteria were not met. Conduction evaluated with the Halo catheter showed bi-directional complete block in these 29 patients. After a follow-up of 16 +/- 4 months there was no recurrence of atrial flutter. CONCLUSION: Surface ECG criteria combined with mapping of the line of block demonstrate evidence of bi-directional IVCT block. This simplified RF ablation of common atrial flutter is feasible with a low recurrence rate.
UNLABELLED: Intra-atrial conduction block within the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus (IVCT) has been shown to predict successful common atrial flutter ablation. However, its demonstration requires the use of several electrode catheters and mapping of the line of block. The aim of this study was prospectively to test the feasibility of a simplified ablation procedure using only two catheters. METHODS: Radio frequency (RF) ablation of common atrial flutter was performed in 30 patients with the sole use of a catheter for atrial pacing and a RF catheter. RF ablation lesions were created in the IVCT. Surface ECG criteria were used to monitor the conduction within the IVCT. The end point during low lateral atrial pacing was an increment in the interval between the pacing artefact and the peak of the R wave in surface lead II >50 ms and clockwise rotation of the P wave axis beyond -30 degrees and inferiorly. Then, the line of lesions was mapped during atrial pacing with the RF catheter. Additional RF lesions were applied if mapping disclosed a zone of residual conduction. Otherwise the procedure was stopped if mapping showed parallel double potentials all along the line. Finally, the block was reassessed with a 'Halo' catheter. RESULTS: Surface ECG criteria were met in 26 patients. Mapping the line of lesions showed a complete corridor of parallel double potentials in these 26 cases and in 3 of the 4 patients in whom ECG criteria were not met. Conduction evaluated with the Halo catheter showed bi-directional complete block in these 29 patients. After a follow-up of 16 +/- 4 months there was no recurrence of atrial flutter. CONCLUSION: Surface ECG criteria combined with mapping of the line of block demonstrate evidence of bi-directional IVCT block. This simplified RF ablation of common atrial flutter is feasible with a low recurrence rate.
Authors: Gabriel Laurent; Alexandra Bourcier; Géraldine Bertaux; Stéphane Fromentin; Michel Fraison; Stéphanie Gonzalez; François Saint Pierre; Jean Eric Wolf Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-01-18 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Mark D O'Neill; Pierre Jais; Anders Jönsson; Yoshihide Takahashi; Frédéric Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Thomas Rostock; Martin Rotter; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2006-04-01