Literature DB >> 11467339

In vitro and in vivo degradation of glucose oxidase enzyme used for an implantable glucose biosensor.

T I Valdes1, F Moussy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The degradation of the glucose oxidase (GOD) enzyme, commonly used in the construction of glucose sensors has been of concern for scientists for decades. Many researchers have found that GOD deactivates over time, mostly due to H2O2 oxidation. This decay can lead to the eventual failure of the sensor. However, these findings are controversial, because other researchers did not find this degradation.
METHODS: The goal of this study was twofold. The first goal was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo stability of two commercially available GOD enzymes and the second goal was to evaluate Nafion as a protective coating of GOD. Crosslinked GOD samples were sandwiched between two 10-microm pore polycarbonate membranes (Nafion coated or uncoated) and placed in custom designed Lexan chambers. Chambers were then exposed to a total of five different environments: Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with and without a 5.6-mM glucose concentration, as well as the subcutaneous in vivo environment of 12 rats. After a period of up to 4 weeks, chambers were retrieved, opened, and tested for enzyme activity using a three-electrode system.
RESULTS: Enzyme activity showed only a slight decrease when exposed to DMEM and PBS without glucose. A more dramatic decrease in activity was observed in enzymes exposed to PBS and DMEM with 5.6 mM glucose. The in vivo environment also caused a significant decrease in enzyme activity, but the decrease was lower than for the in vitro environment with glucose conditions.
CONCLUSION: The presence of glucose in vitro and in vivo led to the production of H2O2, suggesting this to be the main agent responsible for enzyme degradation. The use of a Nafion coating did not provide any additional protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11467339     DOI: 10.1089/15209150050194233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  14 in total

1.  Toward an injectable continuous osmotic glucose sensor.

Authors:  Erik Johannessen; Olga Krushinitskaya; Andrey Sokolov; Häfliger Philipp; Arno Hoogerwerf; Christian Hinderling; Kari Kautio; Jaakko Lenkkeri; Esko Strömmer; Vasily Kondratyev; Tor Inge Tønnessen; Tom Eirik Mollnes; Henrik Jakobsen; Even Zimmer; Bengt Akselsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Recent advances in continuous glucose monitoring: biocompatibility of glucose sensors for implantation in subcutis.

Authors:  Peter H Kvist; Henrik E Jensen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09

3.  "Smart tattoo" glucose biosensors and effect of coencapsulated anti-inflammatory agents.

Authors:  Rohit Srivastava; Rahul Dev Jayant; Ayesha Chaudhary; Michael J McShane
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-01

4.  Immobilization techniques to avoid enzyme loss from oxidase-based biosensors: a one-year study.

Authors:  Jody L House; Ellen M Anderson; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-01

5.  Layer-by-layer assembled semipermeable membrane for amperometric glucose sensors.

Authors:  Ritesh Tipnis; Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Faquir Jain; Diane J Burgess; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

6.  Electrospun fibro-porous polyurethane coatings for implantable glucose biosensors.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Krishna Burugapalli; Wenhui Song; Justin Halls; Francis Moussy; Asim Ray; Yudong Zheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  A promising solution to enhance the sensocompatibility of biosensors in continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Edith E M van den Bosch; Nik H M de Bont; Jun Qiu; Onko-Jan Gelling
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  Continuous monitoring of glucose in subcutaneous tissue using microfabricated differential affinity sensors.

Authors:  Xian Huang; Charles Leduc; Yann Ravussin; Siqi Li; Erin Davis; Bing Song; Qian Wang; Domenico Accili; Rudolph Leibel; Qiao Lin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

9.  Oscillatory glucose flux in INS 1 pancreatic β cells: a self-referencing microbiosensor study.

Authors:  Jin Shi; Eric S McLamore; David Jaroch; Jonathan C Claussen; Raghavendra G Mirmira; Jenna L Rickus; D Marshall Porterfield
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.365

10.  Unmasking the Effects of L-DOPA on Rapid Dopamine Signaling with an Improved Approach for Nafion Coating Carbon-Fiber Microelectrodes.

Authors:  Lingjiao Qi; Elina Thomas; Stephanie H White; Samantha K Smith; Christie A Lee; Leslie R Wilson; Leslie A Sombers
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.