Literature DB >> 11466693

Gains of chromosome 22 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the context of an hyperdiploid karyotype are associated with aggressive clinical features in meningioma patients.

A Maíllo1, P Díaz, J M Sayagués, A Blanco, M D Tabernero, J Ciudad, A López, J M Gonçalves, A Orfao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas usually are considered to be benign tumors; however, 10-20% of cases recur. Few disease characteristics have proved to have prognostic impact for predicting disease free survival. The objective of the current study was to explore the prognostic value of numeric abnormalities of chromosome 22 for meningioma patients.
METHODS: In this study, the authors prospectively analyzed the incidence of numeric chromosome abnormalities of chromosome 22 by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization, using a specific probe for the bcr gene located in chromosome 22q11.2, on a total of 88 consecutive meningioma patients. The authors also analyzed its correlation with both the clinicobiologic characteristics at presentation and the patient's outcome.
RESULTS: The authors' results show that monosomy 22 was present in 49% of the cases and that this numeric chromosomal abnormality is not associated with other prognostic features of the disease. In contrast, gains (trisomy/tetrasomy) of chromosome 22 were detected in 8 (9%) cases who simultaneously showed gains for other chromosomes and represent an adverse prognostic factor regarding disease free survival (P = 0.001); in addition, trisomy/tetrasomy 22 was more frequently related to younger patients (P = 0.001), aggressive histopathologic features (P < 0.000), a greater incidence of DNA aneuploidy (P =0.006), and a higher proportion of S-phase tumor cells (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the authors conclude that loss of a copy of chromosome 22 is a frequent finding in meningioma tumors, but it does not affect the clinical outcome of these patients. In contrast, gains (trisomy/tetrasomy) of chromosome 22, in the context of an hyperdiploid karyotype, although much less frequent, are associated with a more aggressive disease course. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11466693     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<377::aid-cncr1333>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Hyperdiploidy defines a distinct cytogenetic entity of meningiomas.

Authors:  Ralf Ketter; Yoo-Jin Kim; Simone Storck; Jörg Rahnenführer; Bernd F M Romeike; Wolf-Ingo Steudel; Klaus D Zang; Wolfram Henn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Global epigenetic profiling identifies methylation subgroups associated with recurrence-free survival in meningioma.

Authors:  Adriana Olar; Khalida M Wani; Charmaine D Wilson; Gelareh Zadeh; Franco DeMonte; David T W Jones; Stefan M Pfister; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Intratumoral patterns of clonal evolution in meningiomas as defined by multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): is there a relationship between histopathologically benign and atypical/anaplastic lesions?

Authors:  José María Sayagués; María Dolores Tabernero; Angel Maíllo; Ana Espinosa; Ana Rasillo; Pedro Díaz; Juana Ciudad; Antonio López; Marta Merino; Jesús María Gonçalves; Angel Santos-Briz; Francisco Morales; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of genetic regional heterogeneity in meningiomas.

Authors:  Wolfgang K Pfisterer; Nicole C Hank; Mark C Preul; William P Hendricks; Jeanette Pueschel; Stephen W Coons; Adrienne C Scheck
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Molecular characterization of human meningiomas by gene expression profiling using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Mark A Watson; David H Gutmann; Kelly Peterson; Michael R Chicoine; Bette K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Henry G Brown; Arie Perry
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Implicating chromosomal aberrations with meningioma growth and recurrence: results from FISH and MIB-I analysis of grades I and II meningioma tissue.

Authors:  Wolfgang K Pfisterer; Stephen W Coons; Fahmy Aboul-Enein; William P Hendricks; Adrienne C Scheck; Mark C Preul
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Early recurrences in histologically benign/grade I meningiomas are associated with large tumors and coexistence of monosomy 14 and del(1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone.

Authors:  Angel Maillo; Alberto Orfao; Ana B Espinosa; José María Sayagués; Marta Merino; Pablo Sousa; Monica Lara; María Dolores Tabernero
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Notch activation is associated with tetraploidy and enhanced chromosomal instability in meningiomas.

Authors:  Gilson S Baia; Stefano Stifani; Edna T Kimura; Michael W McDermott; Russell O Pieper; Anita Lal
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.715

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.