BACKGROUND: Young patients with ovarian tumors of low malignant potential usually undergo conservative surgery because of the excellent prognosis of these tumors. Patients wishing to conceive after diagnosis occasionally require ovulation induction, but data regarding the safety of assisted reproductive technologies in this situation remains anecdotal. The current study analyzes the outcome of a group of patients who received infertility treatment after the conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors. METHODS: The clinical and pathologic records of 104 patients with a borderline tumor of the ovary who were treated and followed over a 20-year period (1979--1999) were reviewed. Forty-three patients who underwent conservative management were the subjects of the current study. RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 95% of the patients, giving a total of 270 women-years of follow-up. Nine of the 43 patients developed a local recurrence, 8 of which occurred in patients with serous tumors. Five of these 9 patients underwent cystectomy only at the time of recurrence, and all were without evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 75 months (range, 25--93 months). Nineteen patients delivered a total of 25 healthy children after diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumor; 7 of these patients were treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) after diagnosis. Four of these patients developed a recurrence, two patients before the IVF treatment and two patients after the IVF treatment. The latter two patients were without evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up (15 months and 26 months, respectively, after the recurrence). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that ovulation induction may be considered after the diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumor. Recurrences were observed in two of seven patients, all of which remained histologically borderline. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Young patients with ovarian tumors of low malignant potential usually undergo conservative surgery because of the excellent prognosis of these tumors. Patients wishing to conceive after diagnosis occasionally require ovulation induction, but data regarding the safety of assisted reproductive technologies in this situation remains anecdotal. The current study analyzes the outcome of a group of patients who received infertility treatment after the conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors. METHODS: The clinical and pathologic records of 104 patients with a borderline tumor of the ovary who were treated and followed over a 20-year period (1979--1999) were reviewed. Forty-three patients who underwent conservative management were the subjects of the current study. RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 95% of the patients, giving a total of 270 women-years of follow-up. Nine of the 43 patients developed a local recurrence, 8 of which occurred in patients with serous tumors. Five of these 9 patients underwent cystectomy only at the time of recurrence, and all were without evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 75 months (range, 25--93 months). Nineteen patients delivered a total of 25 healthy children after diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumor; 7 of these patients were treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) after diagnosis. Four of these patients developed a recurrence, two patients before the IVF treatment and two patients after the IVF treatment. The latter two patients were without evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up (15 months and 26 months, respectively, after the recurrence). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that ovulation induction may be considered after the diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumor. Recurrences were observed in two of seven patients, all of which remained histologically borderline. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
Authors: María Guadalupe Patrono; Lucas Minig; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Nuria Romero; Juan Francisco Rodriguez Moreno; Jesus Garcia-Donas Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2013-12-17
Authors: Chan Woo Park; Kwang Moon Yang; Hye Ok Kim; Sung Ran Hong; Tae Jin Kim; Kyung Taek Lim; Ki Heon Lee; Inn Soo Kang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.153