Literature DB >> 11466001

Fractal methods to analyze ion channel kinetics.

L S Liebovitch1, D Scheurle, M Rusek, M Zochowski.   

Abstract

We describe the traditional nonfractal and the new fractal methods used to analyze the currents through ion channels in the cell membrane. We discuss the hidden assumptions used in these methods and how those assumptions lead to different interpretations of the same experimental data. The nonfractal methods assumed that channel proteins have a small number of discrete states separated by fixed energy barriers. The goal was to determine the parameters of the kinetic diagram, which are the number of states, the pathways between them, and the kinetic rate constants of those pathways. The discovery that these data have fractal characteristics suggested that fractal approaches might provide more appropriate tools to analyze and interpret these data. The fractal methods determine the characteristics of the data over a broad range of time scales and how those characteristics depend on the time scale at which they are measured. This is done by using a multiscale method to accurately determine the probability density function over many time scales and by determining how the effective kinetic rate constant, the probability of switching states, depends on the effective time scale at which it is measured. These fractal methods have led to new information about the physical properties of channel proteins in terms of the number of conformational substates, the distribution of energy barriers between those states, and how those energy barriers change with time. The new methods developed from the fractal paradigm shifted the analysis of channel data from determining the parameters of a kinetic diagram to determining the physical properties of channel proteins in terms of the distribution of energy barriers and/or their time dependence. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11466001     DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  13 in total

1.  Are rate constants constant?

Authors:  Stephen W Jones
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Fractals in the nervous system: conceptual implications for theoretical neuroscience.

Authors:  Gerhard Werner
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Quantitative analysis of DNA-looping kinetics from tethered particle motion experiments.

Authors:  Carlo Manzo; Laura Finzi
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  The effect of nonspecific binding of lambda repressor on DNA looping dynamics.

Authors:  Carlo Manzo; Chiara Zurla; David D Dunlap; Laura Finzi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Ion channel noise can explain firing correlation in auditory nerves.

Authors:  Bahar Moezzi; Nicolangelo Iannella; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Stochastic differential equation models for ion channel noise in Hodgkin-Huxley neurons.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Nikita S Imennov; Michael Famulare; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-04-11

7.  New Diagnostic Tool for Ion Channel Activity Hidden Behind the Dwell-Time Correlations.

Authors:  Przemysław Borys; Paulina Trybek; Beata Dworakowska; Piotr Bednarczyk; Agata Wawrzkiewicz-Jałowiecka
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 8.  The role of the circadian system in fractal neurophysiological control.

Authors:  Benjamin R Pittman-Polletta; Frank A J L Scheer; Matthew P Butler; Steven A Shea; Kun Hu
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-10

9.  Voltage-Gated Lipid Ion Channels.

Authors:  Andreas Blicher; Thomas Heimburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The what and where of adding channel noise to the Hodgkin-Huxley equations.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.