Literature DB >> 11465654

Does the antihypertensive response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition predict the antihypertensive response to angiotensin receptor antagonism?

G S Stergiou1, I I Skeva, N M Baibas, C B Kalkana, L G Roussias, T D Mountokalakis.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the antihypertensive response to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition can predict the response to angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) antagonism, 33 hypertensive patients were randomized to receive lisinopril (20 mg) or losartan (50 mg) for 5 weeks. Patients were then crossed-over to the alternative treatment for a second 5-week period. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) was measured before randomization and on the final day of each period. The agreement in ABP response between the two drugs was assessed using the following approaches: Subjects were classified as responders and nonresponders using as a threshold an arbitrary level of response (ABP fall > or = 10 mm Hg systolic or > or = 5 mm Hg diastolic) or the median ABP response achieved by each of the drugs. Disagreement between the two drugs in the responders-nonresponders classification was expressed as the proportion of subjects whose ABP responded to one of the drugs only. Lisinopril was more effective than losartan in reducing ABP (mean difference 4.7+/-8.1/3.3+/-5.7 mm Hg, systolic/diastolic, P < .05). Disagreement in the antihypertensive response between the two drugs was found in 39%/33% of subjects for systolic/diastolic ABP using the arbitrary response criterion (33%/39% using the median response criterion). Significant correlations were found between the responses to lisinopril and losartan (r = 0.47/0.59, systolic/diastolic, P < .01). We conclude that in more than one third of hypertensive subjects, the BP response to ACE inhibition fails to predict the response to AT1R antagonism and vice versa. These data suggest that there are differences between these two drug classes that are not only of theoretical but also of practical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11465654     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)01307-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  3 in total

Review 1.  Combination pharmacotherapy in hypertension.

Authors:  George S Stergiou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Effectiveness, safety and cost of drug substitution in hypertension.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Panagiotis Stafylas; George S Stergiou
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pooled Analysis of Multiple Crossover Trials To Optimize Individual Therapy Response to Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Intervention.

Authors:  Sergei I Petrykiv; Gozewijn Dirk Laverman; Frederik Persson; Liffert Vogt; Peter Rossing; Martin H de Borst; Ronald T Gansevoort; Dick de Zeeuw; Hiddo J L Heerspink
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 8.237

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.