Literature DB >> 11465492

Automated detection of differently expressed fragments in mRNA differential display.

T Aittokallio1, P Ojala, T J Nevalainen, O Nevalainen.   

Abstract

We present a novel method for the automated detection of fragments showing dissimilar expression in mRNA differential display. The analysis is based on aligning the numerical electrophoretic lane data in respect of a given distance function defined on a set of fragments, or signal peaks in general. We presume that significant dissimilarities between peaks result in extreme score values computed for aligned peak pairs. Whereas in sequence comparison, an overall sequence similarity score is conventionally used, the current method defines a special dissimilarity score for searching the peak pairs showing the largest relative differences between the lanes. The output of the analysis is a highly reduced list of peak pairs, along with a set of associated features extracted from the lanes. Only the peaks of this list need to be visually confirmed instead of the vast amount of peaks in the original electrophoretic results. The results obtained by the algorithm correlate well with results of visual evaluation of the same electropherograms. The current algorithm may be applied to the study of complex expression patterns in multiple lanes and, in general, to automated recognition of variously defined patterns of quantitative electrophoretic data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11465492     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200106)22:10<1935::AID-ELPS1935>3.0.CO;2-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  6 in total

1.  Differential display: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Dana R Crawford; John C Kochheiser; Gary P Schools; Sharon L Salmon; Kelvin J A Davies
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2002

2.  Whole-genome expression profiling through fragment display and combinatorial gene identification.

Authors:  Ats Metsis; Ulf Andersson; Göran Baurén; Patrik Ernfors; Peter Lönnerberg; Andreas Montelius; Mats Oldin; Arno Pihlak; Sten Linnarsson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Conversion of cDNA differential display results (DDRT-PCR) into quantitative transcription profiles.

Authors:  Balakrishnan Venkatesh; Ursula Hettwer; Birger Koopmann; Petr Karlovsky
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Components of variance in transcriptomics based on electrophoretic separation of cDNA fragments (cDNA-AFLP).

Authors:  Arne Weiberg; Petr Karlovsky
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  GOGOT: a method for the identification of differentially expressed fragments from cDNA-AFLP data.

Authors:  Koji Kadota; Ryoko Araki; Yuji Nakai; Masumi Abe
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 1.405

6.  A normalization strategy applied to HiCEP (an AFLP-based expression profiling) analysis: toward the strict alignment of valid fragments across electrophoretic patterns.

Authors:  Koji Kadota; Ryutaro Fukumura; Joseph J Rodrigue; Ryoko Araki; Masumi Abe
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-03-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.