Literature DB >> 11465372

Effect of high temperature and feeding level on energy utilization in piglets.

A Collin1, J van Milgen, S Dubois, J Noblet.   

Abstract

The effect of temperature (23 or 33 degrees C) and feeding level on components of energy balance was studied in seven groups of individually reared Piétrain x (Landrace x Large White) littermate piglets. Within each litter, one pig was reared at 23 degrees C and given a predefined feeding level close to ad libitum (23AL pigs), one was reared at 33 degrees C and also fed close to ad libitum (33AL), and one was reared at 23 degrees C and pair-fed to the 33AL pig (23PF). Piglets of one litter were acclimated during 2 to 4 wk to their experimental temperature in temperature-controlled rooms before being transferred (one per week) to a respiration chamber for measurement of nitrogen and energy balances. The average initial BW was 22.4 kg. The data on O2 consumption, CO2 production, and physical activity were collected over seven consecutive days and used to calculate total heat production (HPtot) and its components: fasting heat production (FHP), heat production due to physical activity (HPact), and thermic effect of feed (TEF). A preliminary trial was conducted in which heat production was measured in three piglets according to a Latin square design at 23, 25, and 27 degrees C. Total heat production was, but activity-free heat production was not, affected by temperature, and no firm conclusions could be drawn as to whether 23 degrees C was within the thermoneutral zone of fed piglets. In Trial 2, the combination of increased temperature and reduced feed intake resulted in a 20% lesser heat production in 33AL than in 23AL pigs. This was due to a reduction in both TEF (-39%) and FHP (0.642 vs 0.808 MJ x d(-1) x kg BW-0.60). Despite the shorter duration of standing activity, HPact was slightly higher at 33 degrees C, probably due to hyperventilation at this temperature. With similar feeding levels (23PF vs 33AL), HPtot and activity-free heat production were less at 33 degrees C and energy retention as protein (+6%) and fat (+31%) was increased. Because HPact was similar for both treatments, the greater energy retention for 33AL seemed to be due to a greater utilization of feed energy or to a reduced maintenance requirement (i.e., reduced FHP). However, the type of stress imposed on 23PF and 33AL pigs was different and may have affected energy metabolism. The results suggest that the reduction in heat production of piglets at high ambient temperatures is caused by a reduction in voluntary feed intake and differences in energetic efficiency. The mechanisms for the lesser efficiency at 23 degrees C compared to 33 degrees C (at the same level of feed intake) remain unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11465372     DOI: 10.2527/2001.7971849x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  24 in total

1.  Cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase is a response gene involved in porcine adipocyte adaptation to heat stress.

Authors:  Huan Qu; Kolapo M Ajuwon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Adipose tissue-specific responses reveal an important role of lipogenesis during heat stress adaptation in pigs.

Authors:  H Qu; K M Ajuwon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Short-term heat stress altered metabolism and insulin signaling in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Shanthi Ganesan; Corey M Summers; Sarah C Pearce; Nicholas K Gabler; Rudy J Valentine; Lance H Baumgard; Robert P Rhoads; Joshua T Selsby
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Characterization of the acute heat stress response in gilts: III. Genome-wide association studies of thermotolerance traits in pigs.

Authors:  Kwan-Suk Kim; Jacob T Seibert; Zewde Edea; Kody L Graves; Eui-Soo Kim; Aileen F Keating; Lance H Baumgard; Jason W Ross; Max F Rothschild
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Dietary protein-bound or free amino acids differently affect intestinal morphology, gene expression of amino acid transporters, and serum amino acids of pigs exposed to heat stress.

Authors:  Adriana Morales; Tania Gómez; Yuri D Villalobos; Hugo Bernal; John K Htoo; Jolie C González-Vega; Salvador Espinoza; Jorge Yáñez; Miguel Cervantes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Extra dietary protein-bound or free amino acids differently affect the serum concentrations of free amino acids in heat-stressed pigs1.

Authors:  Adriana Morales; Miguel Chávez; Nydia Vásquez; Lucero Camacho; Ernesto Avelar; Néstor Arce; John K Htoo; Miguel Cervantes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of heat stress and insulin sensitizers on pig adipose tissue.

Authors:  J T Seibert; M Abuajamieh; M V Sanz Fernandez; J S Johnson; S K Kvidera; E A Horst; E J Mayorga; S Lei; J F Patience; J W Ross; R P Rhoads; R C Johnson; S M Lonergan; J W Perfield; L H Baumgard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Differentiating between the effects of heat stress and lipopolysaccharide on the porcine ovarian heat shock protein response1.

Authors:  Jacob T Seibert; Malavika K Adur; Ronald B Schultz; Porsha Q Thomas; Zoe E Kiefer; Aileen F Keating; Lance H Baumgard; Jason W Ross
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Characterizing the acute heat stress response in gilts: I. Thermoregulatory and production variables.

Authors:  J T Seibert; K L Graves; B J Hale; A F Keating; L H Baumgard; J W Ross
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Dietary supplementation of artificial sweetener and capsicum oleoresin as a strategy to mitigate the negative consequences of heat stress on pig performance.

Authors:  Morgan E Biggs; Kellie A Kroscher; Lidan D Zhao; Zhenhe Zhang; Emma H Wall; David M Bravo; Robert P Rhoads
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.