Literature DB >> 11465239

Relapsing bacteremia in patients with ventricular assist device: an emergent complication of extended circulatory support.

R A Vilchez1, M C McEllistrem, L H Harrison, K R McCurry, R L Kormos, S Kusne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are currently approved for use as a bridge for transplantation. Although reports have suggested acceptable rates of survival of patients with VAD, there is little information regarding the mechanism and etiology of bacteremia in these patients.
METHODS: We prospectively followed patients who underwent VAD implantation and developed bacteremia during VAD support at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Relapsing bacteremia was defined as at least two episodes of positive blood cultures with a genetically related organism on 2 different days. Species identification and susceptibility testing were performed on all isolates. Pulse field gel electrophoresis was performed on selected blood and VAD isolates.
RESULTS: Between January 1998 and August 1999, 3 patients with VAD developed relapsing bacteremia, which was treated with full courses of antibiotic agents, 2 of whom also developed VAD endocarditis. All 3 patients had documented driveline or device pocket infections with these isolates. Consecutive blood and VAD isolates were found to be genetically related within each patient.
CONCLUSIONS: These patients with bacteremia after VAD implantation had relapse due to the same strain, which may have originated from indolent driveline infection. Endovascular infection in this setting is difficult to eradicate with antibiotic agents and carries a high mortality. These patients should be considered to have priority for orthotopic heart transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11465239     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02690-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  Impact of adverse events on ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  Aleksandar Adzic; Snehal R Patel; Simon Maybaum
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03

2.  Role of biofilm in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis ventricular assist device driveline infections.

Authors:  Faustino A Toba; Hirokazu Akashi; Carlos Arrecubieta; Franklin D Lowy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Clinical manifestations and management of left ventricular assist device-associated infections.

Authors:  Juhsien Jodi C Nienaber; Shimon Kusne; Talha Riaz; Randall C Walker; Larry M Baddour; Alan J Wright; Soon J Park; Holenarasipur R Vikram; Michael R Keating; Francisco A Arabia; Brian D Lahr; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  SdrF, a Staphylococcus epidermidis surface protein, contributes to the initiation of ventricular assist device driveline-related infections.

Authors:  Carlos Arrecubieta; Faustino A Toba; Manuel von Bayern; Hirokazu Akashi; Mario C Deng; Yoshifumi Naka; Franklin D Lowy
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Management and outcomes of left ventricular assist device-associated endocarditis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sinal Patel; Syed Saif Abbas Rizvi; Jae Hwan Choi; Dylan P Horan; Matthew P Weber; Elizabeth J Maynes; Jessica G Y Luc; Nana Aburjania; John W Entwistle; Rohinton J Morris; Howard T Massey; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-11

6.  Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in left ventricular assist device patient.

Authors:  Tariq A Khemees; Ahmad Shabsigh
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2012-10-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.