BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that patients with aortic valve disease and dilatation of the ascending aorta are at risk for later dissection or rupture of the aortic wall when the dilated ascending aorta is not replaced or reinforced at the time of aortic valve replacement. In order to find out whether the more complex surgical procedure of aortic root replacement carries a higher early or late postoperative risk than isolated aortic valve replacement, we conducted a matched-pair study with patients of both groups. METHODS: Between June 1993 and August 1998, 100 consecutive patients with aortic valve disease and ectasia/aneurysm of the ascending aorta underwent replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta with a CarboSeal composite graft (CarboSeal; Sulzer Carbo-Medics Inc, Austin, TX). Identical bileaflet valve prostheses (CarboMedics; Sulzer CarboMedics Inc, Austin, TX) were implanted during the same time period in 928 patients for aortic valve disease. On the basis of various preoperative clinical variables 100 patients with aortic valve replacement were matched to the 100 patients with replacement of the aortic root. The duration of follow-up for both groups was similar with 37 + 17 months (range, 9 to 70) for the CarboSeal group and 38 + 14 months (range, 13 to 65) for the CarboMedics group. Survival and morbidity were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk-adjusted mortality was evaluated by multivariate analysis in a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The early postoperative mortality of 1% in the CarboSeal group and 4% in the CarboMedics group was insignificantly different. Although the overall survival rate at 5 years was lower (60.7% vs 86.3%; p = 0.13) in the CarboSeal group, the freedom from cardiac mortality and valve-related morbidity was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve can be performed with similar operative risk, valve-related morbidity, and late cardiac mortality as isolated aortic valve replacement.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that patients with aortic valve disease and dilatation of the ascending aorta are at risk for later dissection or rupture of the aortic wall when the dilated ascending aorta is not replaced or reinforced at the time of aortic valve replacement. In order to find out whether the more complex surgical procedure of aortic root replacement carries a higher early or late postoperative risk than isolated aortic valve replacement, we conducted a matched-pair study with patients of both groups. METHODS: Between June 1993 and August 1998, 100 consecutive patients with aortic valve disease and ectasia/aneurysm of the ascending aorta underwent replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta with a CarboSeal composite graft (CarboSeal; Sulzer Carbo-Medics Inc, Austin, TX). Identical bileaflet valve prostheses (CarboMedics; Sulzer CarboMedics Inc, Austin, TX) were implanted during the same time period in 928 patients for aortic valve disease. On the basis of various preoperative clinical variables 100 patients with aortic valve replacement were matched to the 100 patients with replacement of the aortic root. The duration of follow-up for both groups was similar with 37 + 17 months (range, 9 to 70) for the CarboSeal group and 38 + 14 months (range, 13 to 65) for the CarboMedics group. Survival and morbidity were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk-adjusted mortality was evaluated by multivariate analysis in a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The early postoperative mortality of 1% in the CarboSeal group and 4% in the CarboMedics group was insignificantly different. Although the overall survival rate at 5 years was lower (60.7% vs 86.3%; p = 0.13) in the CarboSeal group, the freedom from cardiac mortality and valve-related morbidity was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve can be performed with similar operative risk, valve-related morbidity, and late cardiac mortality as isolated aortic valve replacement.