Literature DB >> 11465143

Sonography of the temporomandibular joint from 60 examinations and comparison with MRI and axiography.

C Landes1, H Walendzik, C Klein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Establishing a diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorder is mainly based on clinical assessment, functional examination, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and axiography. Sonographic examination was compared with MRI and axiography in assessing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function in 55 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with different TMJ problems were examined clinically, by means of axiography, sonography and some also by MRI. The range of motion was measured by sonography and axiography and the results compared using Student's t-test. Anatomical details diagnostic for disc-displacement were tested by sonography and MRI.
RESULTS: The average time required for sonography was 2 min and for axiography 20 min. The mean measurement differences for condylar movement in maximal mouth opening was 1.7 mm, for protrusion 1.6 mm and for mediotrusion 2.5 mm. The range of condylar movement as measured by sonography and axiography coincided for opening and for protrusion (statistically significant). No significance was found for lateral excursions. The concordance in diagnosis of disc dislocation, hypermobility and impaired range of motion when comparing ultrasound with MRI was 83%. All sonographic examinations were performed by one person only. Sixty repeat examinations in patients produced no complaints and showed an absolute range of difference of 0.6 mm, with a relative range of 7%. Student's t-test was significant (p<0.05) (two repetitive measurements).
CONCLUSION: Sonography proved to be a fast and reliable method for evaluating the range of movement of the TMJ. The lateral joint capsule, lateral disc, and upper condyle could be demonstrated. Pathological processes such as anterior or lateral disc displacement, disc perforation, seroma following contusion, capsular fibrosis, crystalline structures in the synovia and fracture dislocation of the condyle could be diagnosed with considerable reliability when compared with MRI. However, the medial aspect of the joint, medial disc dislocation and the angulation of the condylar slope could not be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11465143     DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  The efficacy and limitations of USI for diagnosing TMJ internal derangements.

Authors:  Kader Azlağ Pekince; Fatma Çağlayan; Adem Pekince
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: diagnosis and long-term conservative management: a topic review.

Authors:  Mythili Kalladka; Samuel Quek; Gary Heir; Eli Eliav; Muralidhar Mupparapu; Archana Viswanath
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-09-22

3.  Use and accuracy of US guidance for image-guided injections of the temporomandibular joints in children with arthritis.

Authors:  Dimitri A Parra; Melissa Chan; Ganesh Krishnamurthy; Lynn Spiegel; Joao G Amaral; Michael J Temple; Philip R John; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-03-04

4.  Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07

5.  The Role of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  U Siva Kalyan; Kishore Moturi; K Padma Rayalu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-11-30

6.  Assessing the mobility of the mandibular condyle by sonography.

Authors:  Han-Yu Chen; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Chuan-Chin Lu; Jia-Yuan You; Chung-Liang Lai
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.