Literature DB >> 11465138

Computer-aided 3-D 99mTc-DPD-SPECT reconstruction to assess mandibular invasion by intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic improvement or not?

R Schimming1, F D Juengling, G Lauer, C Altehöfer, R Schmelzeisen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was designed to compare computer-aided 3-D 99mTc-DPD-SPECT (Technetium-Dicarboxy propan-single photon emission CT) reconstruction with clinical examination, panoramic radiography, CT scan and conventional 99mTc-DPD-SPECT investigation in the assessment of mandibular bone invasion by squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1997 and December 1999, 88 patients with intraoral squamous cell carcinoma of the regions adjacent to the mandible were enrolled in this study. In 50 cases, mandibular resection (segmental or marginal) was performed based on the pre-treatment diagnostic results. Imaging studies were read independently by four experienced observers.
RESULTS: No differences could be found between presurgical 3-D 99mTc-DPD-SPECT reconstruction and conventional 99mTc-DPD-SPECT investigation. Both techniques revealed a sensitivity of 100% whereas CT scan showed the greatest specificity (93.8%). SPECT investigation had a specificity of 91.6% and the greatest efficiency (95.4%). The greatest predictive positive value was found for CT scan (92.3%). Clinical examination and panoramic radiography displayed the lowest sensitivity, 82.5% vs. 85.0%, and specificity, 79.2% vs. 89.5% respectively.
CONCLUSION: This investigation does not provide evidence that 3-D 99mTc-DPD-SPECT reconstruction has any advantages when compared to conventional 99mTc-DPD-ECT investigation in the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma. Despite a sensitivity of 100% the specificity is still in need of improvement. Until newer methods or techniques become available the combination of CT scanning and conventional 99mTc-DPD-SPECT investigation appears to be the best means of detecting tumour invasion preoperatively and is thus helpful in directing appropriate surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11465138     DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

Review 1.  Complex head and neck specimens and neck dissections. How to handle them.

Authors:  P J Slootweg
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  [Single-photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion caused by oral cancers: a systematic review and Meta-analysis].

Authors:  Wang Xiaonian; Luo Fenjuan; Qiao Xianghe; Yang Wenbin; Lin Jie; Li Chunjie
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-08-01

3.  [On the indications for and morbidity of segmental resection of the mandible for squamous cell carcinoma in the lower oral cavity].

Authors:  A Abler; M Roser; D Weingart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05

4.  [Image fusion of bone SPECT and CT - a specific diagnostic method in oral and maxillofacial surgery].

Authors:  Denys John Loeffelbein; Marco Rainer Kesting; Eckhart Mielke; Margot Jonas; Frank Hölzle; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

5.  Combined SPECT/CT improves detection of initial bone invasion and determination of resection margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck compared to conventional imaging modalities.

Authors:  A Kolk; T Schuster; A Chlebowski; P Lange; K Scheidhauer; M Kesting; O Bissinger; M Schwaiger; J Dinges; J Weitz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Impact of nonhybrid 99mTc-MDP-SPECT/CT image fusion in diagnostic and treatment of oromaxillofacial malignancies.

Authors:  Denys John Loeffelbein; Eckhart Mielke; Andreas Konrad Buck; Marco Rainer Kesting; Frank Hölzle; Thomas Mücke; Steffen Müller; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Current Image Acquisition and Processing Techniques.

Authors:  Sam P Tarassoli; Matthew E Shield; Rhian S Allen; Zita M Jessop; Thomas D Dobbs; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 8.  Contemporary Diagnostic Imaging of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Paulina Pałasz; Łukasz Adamski; Magdalena Górska-Chrząstek; Anna Starzyńska; Michał Studniarek
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.