Literature DB >> 11464941

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): compared sensitivity of different motor response parameters in ALS.

J Pouget1, S Trefouret, S Attarian.   

Abstract

Owing to the low sensitivity of clinical signs in assessing upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement in ALS, there is a need for investigative tools capable of detecting abnormal function of the pyramidal tract. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may contribute to the diagnosis by reflecting a UMN dysfunction that is not clinically detectable. Several parameters for the motor responses to TMS can be evaluated with different levels of significance in healthy subjects compared with ALS patients. The central motor conduction time, however, is not sensitive in detecting subclinical UMN defects in individual ALS patients. The amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP), expressed as the percentage of the maximum wave, also has a low sensitivity. In some cases, the corticomotor threshold is decreased early in the disease course as a result of corticomotor neuron hyperexcitability induced by glutamate. Later, the threshold increases, indicating a loss of UMN. In our experience, a decreased silent period duration appears to be the most sensitive parameter when using motor TMS in ALS. TMS is also a sensitive technique for investigating the corticobulbar tract, which is difficult to study by other methods. TMS is a widely available, painless and safe technique with a good sensitivity that can visualize both corticospinal and corticobulbar tract abnormalities. The sensitivity can be improved further by taking into account the several MEP parameters, including latency and cortical silent period decreased duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11464941     DOI: 10.1080/14660820052415817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord        ISSN: 1466-0822


  6 in total

1.  Optimising the detection of upper motor neuron function dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Abena D Osei-Lah; Kerry R Mills
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Tobias Loetscher; Richard A L Macdonell; Amy Brodtmann
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: objective upper motor neuron markers.

Authors:  Petra Kaufmann; Hiroshi Mitsumoto
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Modulation of spontaneous motor unit potentials by a new motor cortical magnetic stimulation method in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Santosh A Helekar; Jason Thonhoff; Blessy S John; Lisa Nguyen; David B Rosenfield; Stanley H Appel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.682

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in ALS: utility of central motor conduction tests.

Authors:  A G Floyd; Q P Yu; P Piboolnurak; M X Tang; Y Fang; W A Smith; J Yim; L P Rowland; H Mitsumoto; S L Pullman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Cortical hyperexcitability in patients with C9ORF72 mutations: Relationship to phenotype.

Authors:  Olivia Schanz; Devin Bageac; Laura Braun; Bryan J Traynor; Tanya J Lehky; Mary Kay Floeter
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.