BACKGROUND: At least three genetic hallmarks identify aggressive tumour behaviour in neuroblastomas; amplification of the oncogene MYCN; deletion (loss of heterozygosity [LOH]) at the short arm of chromosome 1 (del1p36), seen in approximately 28% of the cases; and di-tetraploidy. The MYCN oncogene is amplified in approximately 23% of all neuroblastomas and becomes important for the stratification of therapy in localised and 4s tumours. Up to now, it has been believed that the genetic constellation of neuroblastic tumours is stable and does not alter during tumour evolution or during tumour progression. PROCEDURE: Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation techniques (FISH) to investigate different tumour areas on touch preparations and histological sections, we show that genetic heterogeneity can be detected in neuroblastomas, especially in tumours detected by urinary mass screening. CONCLUSION: The identification of such cell clones is important, because the MYCN amplification and/or the deletion at 1p36 appear to be responsible for aggressive local growth and development of metastases.
BACKGROUND: At least three genetic hallmarks identify aggressive tumour behaviour in neuroblastomas; amplification of the oncogene MYCN; deletion (loss of heterozygosity [LOH]) at the short arm of chromosome 1 (del1p36), seen in approximately 28% of the cases; and di-tetraploidy. The MYCN oncogene is amplified in approximately 23% of all neuroblastomas and becomes important for the stratification of therapy in localised and 4s tumours. Up to now, it has been believed that the genetic constellation of neuroblastic tumours is stable and does not alter during tumour evolution or during tumour progression. PROCEDURE: Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation techniques (FISH) to investigate different tumour areas on touch preparations and histological sections, we show that genetic heterogeneity can be detected in neuroblastomas, especially in tumours detected by urinary mass screening. CONCLUSION: The identification of such cell clones is important, because the MYCN amplification and/or the deletion at 1p36 appear to be responsible for aggressive local growth and development of metastases.
Authors: A P Berbegall; E Villamón; M Piqueras; I Tadeo; A Djos; P F Ambros; T Martinsson; I M Ambros; A Cañete; V Castel; S Navarro; R Noguera Journal: Oncogene Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Maija Wolf; Miikka Korja; Ritva Karhu; Henrik Edgren; Sami Kilpinen; Kalle Ojala; Spyro Mousses; Anne Kallioniemi; Hannu Haapasalo Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Gabor Méhes; Andrea Luegmayr; Rosa Kornmüller; Ingeborg M Ambros; Ruth Ladenstein; Helmut Gadner; Peter F Ambros Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: M Reza Abbasi; Fikret Rifatbegovic; Clemens Brunner; Georg Mann; Andrea Ziegler; Ulrike Pötschger; Roman Crazzolara; Marek Ussowicz; Martin Benesch; Georg Ebetsberger-Dachs; Godfrey C F Chan; Neil Jones; Ruth Ladenstein; Inge M Ambros; Peter F Ambros Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eva Villamón; Ana P Berbegall; Marta Piqueras; Irene Tadeo; Victoria Castel; Anna Djos; Tommy Martinsson; Samuel Navarro; Rosa Noguera Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: G Schleiermacher; J Michon; I Huon; C Dubois d'Enghien; J Klijanienko; H Brisse; A Ribeiro; V Mosseri; H Rubie; C Munzer; C Thomas; D Valteau-Couanet; A Auvrignon; D Plantaz; O Delattre; J Couturier Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 7.640