Literature DB >> 11464257

A forced titration study of antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan cilexetil in comparison to losartan: CLAIM Study II.

D G Vidt1, W B White, E Ridley, M Rahman, S Harris, J Vendetti, E L Michelson, R Wang.   

Abstract

An 8-week, multicentre (72 sites in the US), double-blind, randomised, parallel group, forced titration study compared the antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan cilexetil and losartan. A total of 611 patients with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95 to 114 mm Hg) were randomised initially to candesartan cilexetil 16 mg once daily or losartan 50 mg once daily. After 2 weeks of randomised treatment, the doses of candesartan cilexetil and losartan were doubled to 32 mg and 100 mg once daily and continued respectively for 6 weeks. At week 8, candesartan cilexetil lowered the blood pressure (BP) at 24 h (trough), 6 h (peak) and 48 h post dose to a significantly greater extent (P < 0.05) than losartan: candesartan cilexetil lowered trough BP by 13.4/10.5 mm Hg, peak BP by 15.5/12.9 mm Hg and 48-h BP by 10.5/9.9 mm Hg compared to a reduction of trough BP by 10.1/9.1 mm Hg, peak BP by 12.0/9.5 mm Hg, and 48-h BP by 5.9/7.0 mm Hg by losartan. The responder and control rates were numerically higher in the candesartan cilexetil group, but the differences did not reach statistical significance; the responder rates were 58.8% for the candesartan cilexetil group and 52.1% for the losartan group and control rates were 49.0% for the candesartan cilexetil group and 44.6% for the losartan group. Overall, both treatment regimens were well tolerated. A total of 15 of the 611 (2.5%) patients withdrew from the study due to an adverse event, including nine (2.9%) in the candesartan cilexetil group and six (2.0%) in the losartan group. In conclusion, this forced titration study confirms that candesartan cilexetil is more effective in lowering BP than losartan when compared at once daily maximum doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11464257     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  15 in total

1.  Angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  Amy Barreras; Cheryle Gurk-Turner
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

Review 2.  Candesartan cilexetil: an update of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Stephanie E Easthope; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Hazel Mae A Abraham; C Michael White; William B White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil 32 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg provides the full additive antihypertensive effect of the components: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in primary care.

Authors:  Istvan Edes
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  A multicentre, 12-week study of imidapril and candesartan cilexetil in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  José L Palma-Gamiz; Mariano Pêgo; Emilio Marquez; Montserrat Pujol; Josefina Olivan; Eduardo Alegría; José Domingo Sagastagoitia-Gorostiza; José Ramón Gonzalez-Juanatey
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Cardiovascular events in subgroups of patients during primary treatment of hypertension with candesartan or losartan.

Authors:  David Russell; Jan Stålhammar; Johan Bodegard; Pål Hasvold; Marcus Thuresson; Sverre E Kjeldsen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  R M Nixon; E Müller; A Lowy; H Falvey
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.