Literature DB >> 11464151

Deciding where and how to be tested for HIV: what matters most?

H S Skolnik1, K A Phillips, D Binson, J W Dilley.   

Abstract

This study examined preferences for specific types of HIV tests as well as for test attributes such as cost, counseling, and privacy. A survey was administered to 354 clients of public testing services. Nonparametric tests and logistic regression were used to compare test preferences and attribute ratings, and to assess differences by demographic and risk groups. Nearly two thirds of respondents chose a public clinic test as their first choice, whereas 24% chose a home self-test, 12% chose a test at a doctor's office, and 1% chose a home specimen-collection test. Three attributes (accuracy/timeliness, privacy of test disclosure, and linking of test results) were rated equally-and most-important. In-person counseling was endorsed as the fourth most important attribute. Availability of in-person counseling was the strongest predictor of "loyalty" to public clinic tests-a consistent preference for that type of test even when the other tests were offered as additional no-cost options. There was also substantial interest in home self-tests. The results suggest specific attributes of testing that may be particularly important to individuals from diverse demographic and risk backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11464151     DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200107010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  21 in total

1.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; F Reed Johnson; Tara Maddala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Motivation and experiences of self-testers regarding tests for cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Martine H P Ickenroth; Janaica E J Grispen; Gaby Ronda; Marloes Tacken; Geert-Jan Dinant; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Point-of-care testing for HIV: HIV counselling and testing.

Authors:  Bl Johnston; Jm Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03

5.  Implications and impact of the new US Centers for Disease Control and prevention HIV testing guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer C Millen; Christian Arbelaez; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Acceptability of HIV Testing Sites Among Rural and Urban African Americans Who Use Cocaine.

Authors:  D Keith Branham; Tyrone F Borders; Katharine E Stewart; Geoffrey M Curran; Brenda M Booth
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2017-02

7.  How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Martine H P Ickenroth; Gaby Ronda; Janaica E J Grispen; Geert-Jan Dinant; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol).

Authors:  Janaica E J Grispen; Martine H P Ickenroth; Nanne K de Vries; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gaby Ronda; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  HIV Self-Testing Increases HIV Testing Frequency in High-Risk Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  David A Katz; Matthew R Golden; James P Hughes; Carey Farquhar; Joanne D Stekler
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  A review of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) rapid testing.

Authors:  S Ha; S Foley; D Paquette; J Seto
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2014-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.