Literature DB >> 11464068

Psychosocial aspects of aphasia: whose perspectives?

S Parr1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews some different meanings of the term 'psychosocial' and identifies the different ways in which the social and psychological sequelae of aphasia can be explored. These include qualitative methods, which seem well suited to addressing such complex issues. Having outlined some features of qualitative research, the paper describes a study in which fifty people talked about the consequences and significance of their long-term aphasia. Their 'insider perspective' on aphasia suggests its impacts are extensive, complex, direct and indirect, interconnected, systemic, dynamic and diversely experienced. The paper discusses the various implications of the study for clinicians and researchers concerned with the psychosocial aspects of aphasia and outlines how some of the issues raised in the interviews might be addressed. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11464068     DOI: 10.1159/000052681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop        ISSN: 1021-7762            Impact factor:   0.849


  4 in total

1.  Listener Perceptions of Simulated Fluent Speech in Nonfluent Aphasia Aphasiology.

Authors:  Tyson G Harmon; Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley; Richard A Faldowski
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Perspectives of people with aphasia post-stroke towards personal recovery and living successfully: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Molly Manning; Anne MacFarlane; Anne Hickey; Sue Franklin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The dysarthria impact profile: a preliminary French experience with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Alban Letanneux; Margaret Walshe; François Viallet; Serge Pinto
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2013-05-23

Review 4.  Longer-term needs of stroke survivors with communication difficulties living in the community: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Faye Wray; David Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.