Literature DB >> 11463010

Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Warfarin Optimal Duration Italian Trial Investigators.

G Agnelli1, P Prandoni, M G Santamaria, P Bagatella, A Iorio, M Bazzan, M Moia, G Guazzaloca, A Bertoldi, C Tomasi, G Scannapieco, W Ageno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, continuing anticoagulant therapy beyond three months is associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent thrombosis during the period of therapy. Whether this benefit persists after anticoagulant therapy is discontinued is controversial.
METHODS: Patients with a first episode of idiopathic proximal deep venous thrombosis who had completed three months of oral anticoagulant therapy (with warfarin, in 97 percent of the cases and acenocoumarol in 3 percent) were randomly assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulants or to their continuation for nine additional months. The primary study outcome was recurrence of symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism during at least two years of follow-up.
RESULTS: The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed that of 134 patients assigned to continued oral anticoagulant therapy, 21 had a recurrence of venous thromboembolism (15.7 percent; average follow-up, 37.8 months), as compared with 21 of 133 patients assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy (15.8 percent; average follow-up, 37.2 months), resulting in a relative risk of 0.99 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 1.73). During the initial nine months after randomization (after all patients received three months of therapy), 1 patient had a recurrence while receiving oral anticoagulant therapy (0.7 percent), as compared with 11 of the patients assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy (8.3 percent; P=0.003). The incidence of recurrence after the discontinuation of treatment was 5.1 percent per patient-year in patients in whom oral anticoagulant therapy was discontinued after 3 months (95 percent confidence interval, 3.2 to 7.5 percent; average interval since discontinuation, 37.2 months) and 5.0 percent per patient-year in patients who received an additional 9 months of oral anticoagulant therapy (95 percent confidence interval, 3.1 to 7.8 percent; average interval since discontinuation, 29.4 months). None of the recurrences were fatal. Four patients had non-fatal major bleeding during the extended period of anticoagulant therapy (3.0 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, the clinical benefit associated with extending the duration of anticoagulant therapy to one year is not maintained after the therapy is discontinued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11463010     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200107193450302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  89 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

Authors:  Michelle Petri
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Breadth of complications of long-term oral anticoagulant care.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Marco Donadini
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 4.  Venous thromboembolism: Predicting recurrence and the need for extended anticoagulation.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Yogendra Kanthi; James B Froehlich
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  The standard is still the standard or why an INR of 2-3 is still the optimal intensity for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  John W Eikelboom; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Jack Hirsh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-31

Review 8.  [Therapy and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with vitamin K antagonists].

Authors:  R M Bauersachs
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Physician compliance with outpatient oral anticoagulant guidelines in Auvergne, France.

Authors:  Marc Ruivard; Christine Berger; Abdellaziz Achaibi; Claude Campagne; Pierre Philippe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Haemostatic genetic variants, ABO blood group and bleeding risk during oral anticoagulant treatment after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin.

Authors:  D M O Pruissen; F R Rosendaal; J W Gorter; A A Garcia; L J Kappelle; A Algra
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.