Literature DB >> 11462960

[Maternal anxiety induced by prenatal diagnostic techniques: detection and management].

E Hertling-Schaal1, F Perrotin, L de Poncheville, J Lansac, G Body.   

Abstract

Recent improvement in the screening for chromosomal defects, in particular the widespread use of ultrasonography and maternal biochemistry, is leading to a high number of fetal invasive tests (amniocentesis or chorion villus sampling). An increased level of anxiety in the pregnant women, which may sometimes continue until the postnatal period, is believed to be due to these prenatal diagnosis procedures. Maternal anxiety originates in the doubts related to fetal integrity and pregnancy outcome after information of a positive biochemical screening or visualisation of an ultrasound marker of chromosomal abnormality. Each specialist involved in prenatal care should take special attention to this, because of at least two reasons. First, anxiety may reduce maternal well being during pregnancy. Second, because it could have deleterious effects on parent to infant relationships. Without any intention of lowering the positive aspects of prenatal diagnosis, it appears essential to consider the negative effects anxiety may have on both parents. From our own experience and the conclusion of previous reported studies, we suggest some measures to reduce the level of maternal anxiety related to prenatal diagnosis: (i) improvement in the quality and transparency of information offered to pregnant women; (ii) training and involvement in psychological and emotional care for each member in the medical team; (iii) special and systematic psychological care for the "high risk" pregnant women regarding anxious disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11462960     DOI: 10.1016/s1297-9589(01)00158-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil        ISSN: 1297-9589


  5 in total

1.  High resolution non-invasive detection of a fetal microdeletion using the GCREM algorithm.

Authors:  Tianjiao Chu; Suveyda Yeniterzi; Aleksandar Rajkovic; W Allen Hogge; Mary Dunkel; Patricia Shaw; Kimberly Bunce; David G Peters
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Recent advances of genomic testing in perinatal medicine.

Authors:  David G Peters; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Urvashi Surti; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Discovery of epigenetic biomarkers for the noninvasive diagnosis of fetal disease.

Authors:  Kimberly Bunce; Tianjiao Chu; Urvashi Surti; William Allen Hogge; David G Peters
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions.

Authors:  Tianjiao Chu; Suveyda Yeniterzi; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Mary Dunkel; Patricia A Shaw; Kimberly D Bunce; David G Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of pre-procedural anxiety and depression scores for patients undergoing chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis: An alternative perspective on prenatal invasive techniques.

Authors:  Cem Yasar Sanhal; Inanc Mendilcioglu; Murat Ozekinci; Mehmet Simsek; Selen Bozkurt
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.