OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging with contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and helical CT to determine incomplete local treatment after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (24 men and 11 women; mean age, 64 years) with 43 hepatocellular carcinomas (3.6 +/- 1.1 cm) were treated using internally cooled radiofrequency ablation therapy. Therapeutic response was evaluated at 4 months with dual-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT, conventional power Doppler Sonography, and pulse inversion harmonic imaging using a sonographic contrast agent (SH-508). CT and sonographic studies were reviewed separately in random order by four radiologists at different consensus conferences. Sensitivity and specificity of the sonographic methods were determined using CT as a gold standard and results were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: CT examinations identified residual tumor in 12 lesions (27.9%). Although conventional contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography identified residual viable tumor foci in four incompletely treated lesions (9.3%), contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging identified residual tumoral enhancement in 10 lesions (23.3%). Thus, the sensitivity of pulse inversion harmonic imaging (83.3%) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) for detecting residual nonablated tumor compared with conventional contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging may enable the detection of residual nonablated tumor in more cases than contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and may ultimately prove to be a useful adjunct for percutaneous ablation therapies. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced axial imaging (CT or MR imaging) is currently the most sensitive test for managing thermal ablation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging with contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and helical CT to determine incomplete local treatment after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (24 men and 11 women; mean age, 64 years) with 43 hepatocellular carcinomas (3.6 +/- 1.1 cm) were treated using internally cooled radiofrequency ablation therapy. Therapeutic response was evaluated at 4 months with dual-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT, conventional power Doppler Sonography, and pulse inversion harmonic imaging using a sonographic contrast agent (SH-508). CT and sonographic studies were reviewed separately in random order by four radiologists at different consensus conferences. Sensitivity and specificity of the sonographic methods were determined using CT as a gold standard and results were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: CT examinations identified residual tumor in 12 lesions (27.9%). Although conventional contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography identified residual viable tumor foci in four incompletely treated lesions (9.3%), contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging identified residual tumoral enhancement in 10 lesions (23.3%). Thus, the sensitivity of pulse inversion harmonic imaging (83.3%) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) for detecting residual nonablated tumor compared with conventional contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging may enable the detection of residual nonablated tumor in more cases than contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and may ultimately prove to be a useful adjunct for percutaneous ablation therapies. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced axial imaging (CT or MR imaging) is currently the most sensitive test for managing thermal ablation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: Mostafa Atri; Mark R Gertner; Masoom A Haider; Robert A Weersink; John Trachtenberg Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 1.862