Literature DB >> 11461191

Feature (gene) selection in gene expression-based tumor classification.

M Xiong1, W Li, J Zhao, L Jin, E Boerwinkle.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in changing the emphasis of tumor classification from morphologic to molecular. Gene expression profiles may offer more information than morphology and provide an alternative to morphology-based tumor classification systems. Gene selection involves a search for gene subsets that are able to discriminate tumor tissue from normal tissue, and may have either clear biological interpretation or some implication in the molecular mechanism of the tumorigenesis. Gene selection is a fundamental issue in gene expression-based tumor classification. In the formation of a discriminant rule, the number of genes is large relative to the number of tissue samples. Too many genes can harm the performance of the tumor classification system and increase the cost as well. In this report, we discuss criteria and illustrate techniques for reducing the number of genes and selecting an optimal (or near optimal) subset of genes from an initial set of genes for tumor classification. The practical advantages of gene selection over other methods of reducing the dimensionality (e.g., principal components), include its simplicity, future cost savings, and higher likelihood of being adopted in a clinical setting. We analyze the expression profiles of 2000 genes in 22 normal and 40 colon tumor tissues, 5776 sequences in 14 human mammary epithelial cells and 13 breast tumors, and 6817 genes in 47 acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 25 acute myeloid leukemia samples. Through these three examples, we show that using 2 or 3 genes can achieve more than 90% accuracy of classification. This result implies that after initial investigation of tumor classification using microarrays, a small number of selected genes may be used as biomarkers for tumor classification, or may have some relevance in tumor development and serve as a potential drug target. In this report we also show that stepwise Fisher's linear discriminant function is a practicable method for gene expression-based tumor classification. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11461191     DOI: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Metab        ISSN: 1096-7192            Impact factor:   4.797


  19 in total

Review 1.  Microarray-based expression profiling of normal and malignant immune cells.

Authors:  Rheem D Medh
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Identification of Marker Genes for Cancer Based on Microarrays Using a Computational Biology Approach.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang
Journal:  Curr Bioinform       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.543

3.  Prediction of Fibrinogen Adsorption for Biodegradable Polymers: Integration of Molecular Dynamics and Surrogate Modeling.

Authors:  Anna V Gubskaya; Vladyslav Kholodovych; Doyle Knight; Joachim Kohn; William J Welsh
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Network Medicine: New Paradigm in the -Omics Era.

Authors:  Nancy Lan Guo
Journal:  Anat Physiol       Date:  2011-12-13

5.  An entropy-based gene selection method for cancer classification using microarray data.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Liu; Arun Krishnan; Adrian Mondry
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data.

Authors:  Christophe Ambroise; Geoffrey J McLachlan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Error margin analysis for feature gene extraction.

Authors:  Chi Kin Chow; Hai Long Zhu; Jessica Lacy; Winston P Kuo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Classification of Dukes' B and C colorectal cancers using expression arrays.

Authors:  Casper Møller Frederiksen; Steen Knudsen; Søren Laurberg; Torben F Ørntoft
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Jana Doering; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Uwe J Roblick; Nana K Bündgen; Daniel Nicorici; Ulrike Kronenwett; Shruti Rathnagiriswaran; Rama K R Mettu; Yan Ma; Stefan Krüger; Hans-Peter Bruch; Gert Auer; Nancy L Guo; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Genomic instability influences the transcriptome and proteome in endometrial cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Nana K Bündgen; Timo Gemoll; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Caroline Lundgren; Danny Wangsa; Jana Doering; Hans-Peter Bruch; Britta Nordstroem; Uwe J Roblick; Hans Jörnvall; Gert Auer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.