Literature DB >> 11461055

Do oarsmen have asymmetries in the strength of their back and leg muscles?

S Parkin1, A V Nowicky, O M Rutherford, A H McGregor.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether asymmetry of the strength of the leg and trunk musculature is more prominent in rowers than in controls. Nineteen oarsmen and 20 male controls matched for age, height and body mass performed a series of isokinetic and isometric strength tests on an isokinetic dynamometer. These strength tests focused on the trunk and leg muscles. Comparisons of strength were made between and within groups for right and left symmetry patterns, hamstring: quadriceps ratios, and trunk flexor and extensor ratios. The results revealed no left and right asymmetries in either the knee extensor or flexor strength parameters (including both isometric and isokinetic measures). Knee extensor strength was significantly greater in the rowing population, but knee flexor strength was similar between the two groups. No difference was seen between the groups for the hamstring: quadriceps strength ratio. In the rowing population, stroke side had no influence on leg strength. No differences were observed in the isometric strength of the trunk flexors and extensors between groups, although EMG activity was significantly higher in the rowing population. Patterns of asymmetry of muscle activity were observed between the left and right erector spinae muscles during extension, which was significantly related to rowing side (P < 0.01). These observations could be related to the high incidence of low back pain in oarsmen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11461055     DOI: 10.1080/026404101750238971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  10 in total

1.  Lateral abdominal muscle symmetry in collegiate single-sided rowers.

Authors:  Norman W Gill; Beth E Mason; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

2.  Rowing injuries.

Authors:  Jane S Rumball; Constance M Lebrun; Stephen R Di Ciacca; Karen Orlando
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Strength testing and training of rowers: a review.

Authors:  Trent W Lawton; John B Cronin; Michael R McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Establishment of a protocol to test fatigue of the trunk muscles.

Authors:  G Corin; P H Strutton; A H McGregor
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  The impact of ergometer design on hip and trunk muscle activity patterns in elite rowers: an electromyographic assessment.

Authors:  Alex V Nowicky; Sara Horne; Richard Burdett
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Elderly oarsmen have larger trunk and thigh muscles and greater strength than age-matched untrained men.

Authors:  Meiko Asaka; Chiyoko Usui; Megumi Ohta; Yohei Takai; Tetsuo Fukunaga; Mitsuru Higuchi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Injury prevention, performance and return to sport: How can science help?

Authors:  Alison H McGregor
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-16

8.  Asymmetry of Force Fluctuation During Low Intensity Isometric Contraction in Leg Muscle.

Authors:  Kazushige Oshita; Sumio Yano
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2010-04-15

9.  The Use of Thermal Imaging in the Evaluation of the Symmetry of Muscle Activity in Various Types of Exercises (Symmetrical and Asymmetrical).

Authors:  Monika Chudecka; Anna Lubkowska; Katarzyna Leźnicka; Krzysztof Krupecki
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Timing and Modulation of Activity in the Lower Limb Muscles During Indoor Rowing: What Are the Key Muscles to Target in FES-Rowing Protocols?

Authors:  Taian M Vieira; Giacinto Luigi Cerone; Costanza Stocchi; Morgana Lalli; Brian Andrews; Marco Gazzoni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.