Literature DB >> 11459441

Carry-over effects in bioequivalence studies.

G Dangelo1, D Potvin, J Turgeon.   

Abstract

Carry-over effects are often considered to be one of the main problems of the cross-over design: should we adjust for carry-over or not? We attempt to answer this question by examining the observed frequency of carry-over effects in actual bioequivalence studies. A total of 96 six-sequence, three-period, three-treatment fed-fasted studies are analyzed for carry-over effects and 324 two-sequence, two-period, two-treatment fasted studies are analyzed indirectly for carry-over effects via sequence effects. Two log-transformed pharmacokinetic variables, Cmax and AUC0-t, are modeled in an analysis of variance. The impact of statistically significant carry-over effects on bioequivalence results is examined and the rationale behind not adjusting for carry-over in bioequivalence studies is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459441     DOI: 10.1081/BIP-100104196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  2 in total

1.  A survey of the likelihood approach to bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  Leena Choi; Brian Caffo; Charles Rohde
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Changes in Kidney Function Do Not Differ between Healthy Adults Consuming Higher- Compared with Lower- or Normal-Protein Diets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michaela C Devries; Arjun Sithamparapillai; K Scott Brimble; Laura Banfield; Robert W Morton; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.798

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.