Literature DB >> 11459270

Periampullary cancers: are there differences?

J M Sarmiento1, D M Nagomey, M G Sarr, M B Farnell.   

Abstract

Our review supports the clinical impression that periampullary cancers vary in outcome after resection. Overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy is greatest for patients with ampullary and duodenal cancers, intermediate for patients with bile duct cancer, and least for patients with pancreatic cancer. Moreover, survival for each tumor stage is greater for nonpancreatic periampullary cancers than for pancreatic cancers. Invasion of the pancreas by nonpancreatic periampullary cancers is a major factor adversely affecting survival. Recent data suggest that inherent differences in tumor biology rather than embryologic, anatomic, or histologic factors probably account for these differences in survival. Finally, although pancreaticoduodenectomy remains the procedure of choice for resectable periampullary cancers, further increases in survival will likely evolve through more effective neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies rather than modifications in the surgical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459270     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70142-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  39 in total

1.  Is local resection adequate for T1 stage ampullary cancer?

Authors:  Albert Amini; John T Miura; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Fabian M Johnston; Susan Tsai; Kathleen K Christians; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Imaging for the diagnosis and staging of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  R M Walsh; M Connelly; M Baker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Defining the role of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy on resected adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of vater.

Authors:  John T Miura; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Albert Amini; Fabian M Johnston; Susan Tsai; Beth Erickson; Edward J Quebbeman; Kathleen K Christians; Douglas B Evans; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Can pancreaticoduodenectomy be used to palliate selective metastatic malignancies? Case report of malignant fibrous histiocytoma.

Authors:  Mindy M Ho; Thomas J Howard; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Salvatore Paiella; Valentina Allegrini; Marco Ramera; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Replaced Common Hepatic Artery and Portal Vein Reconstruction in Primary Carcinoma Duodenum: a Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Gunjan S Desai; Prasad Pande; Rajiv C Shah; Palepu Jagannath
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-09

7.  Large retroperitoneal paraganglioma concurrent with periampullary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadreza Hakimian; Azar Naimi; Seyed Mohammadhasan Emami; Golnar Rozatii; Vahid Goharian
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Molecular analysis of PIK3CA, BRAF, and RAS oncogenes in periampullary and ampullary adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  Frank Schönleben; Wanglong Qiu; John D Allendorf; John A Chabot; Helen E Remotti; Gloria H Su
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical results after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with distal common bile duct cancer: focused on the rate of decrease in serum bilirubin.

Authors:  Yun Mee Choi; Eung-Ho Cho; Keon-Young Lee; Seung-Ik Ahn; Sun Keun Choi; Sei Joong Kim; Yoon Seok Hur; Young Up Cho; Kee Chun Hong; Seok Hwan Shin; Kyung Rae Kim; Ze-Hong Woo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Differentiation markers in pancreatic head adenocarcinomas: MUC1 and MUC4 expression indicates poor prognosis in pancreatobiliary differentiated tumours.

Authors:  Arne Westgaard; Aasa R Schjølberg; Milada Cvancarova; Tor J Eide; Ole Petter F Clausen; Ivar P Gladhaug
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.