Literature DB >> 11458144

An unexpected outcome during testing of commercially available demineralized bone graft materials: how safe are the nonallograft components?

M P Bostrom1, X Yang, M Kennan, H Sandhu, E Dicarlo, J M Lane.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Radiographic and histologic analyses of commercially available bone graft materials were performed.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the osteoinductive efficacy of commercially available demineralized bone matrix material. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relative in vivo bone formation and toxicology of the nonallograft components the make up various commercially available demineralized bone matrix products are not known.
METHODS: An in vivo bone formation model was used in 30 athymic rats. Six different bone grafting materials were tested in subcutaneous and intermuscular locations. After 4 weeks, radiographic and histologic testing of bone formation was performed.
RESULTS: Eight of nine rats implanted with Grafton demineralized bone matrix products died 1 to 4 days after implantation of the bone graft material. None of the remaining 10 animals implanted with the four other grafting materials died. The experiment was modified and completed with a lower dose of bone graft material. Pathologic analysis indicated that the cause of death was hemorrhagic necrosis of the kidneys, most likely caused by a toxic effect on the glomeruli and tubules. A possible causative factor may have been the glycerol in the graft material.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the volume of Grafton product per kilogram of body weight used in this study was approximately eight times the maximum volume used in humans, the authors believe that this data must be reported because this product is used substantially in clinical settings. In addition, the osteoinductive performance and relative safety of the nonallograft components in all commercially available demineralized bone grafts are not known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11458144     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  The clinical use of allografts, demineralized bone matrices, synthetic bone graft substitutes and osteoinductive growth factors: a survey study.

Authors:  Mathias P G Bostrom; Daniel A Seigerman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  Growth factors in orthopaedic surgery: demineralized bone matrix versus recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  Maurice Hinsenkamp; Jean-Francois Collard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Characterization of the inflammatory response to four commercial bone graft substitutes using a murine biocompatibility model.

Authors:  David C Markel; S Trent Guthrie; Bin Wu; Zheng Song; Paul H Wooley
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2012-01-18

4.  Hydrogels derived from demineralized and decellularized bone extracellular matrix.

Authors:  M J Sawkins; W Bowen; P Dhadda; H Markides; L E Sidney; A J Taylor; F R A J Rose; S F Badylak; K M Shakesheff; L J White
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Spinal fusion with demineralized calf fetal growth plate as novel biomaterial in rat model: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Amin Bigham-Sadegh; Iraj Karimi; Ahmad Oryan; Elena Mahmoudi; Zahra Shafiei-Sarvestani
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Comparison of Fusion Rates between Glycerol-Preserved and Frozen Composite Allografts in Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Ian Rodway; Julie Gander
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-10-28

7.  Three dimensional printed macroporous polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for promoting bone formation in a critical-size rat calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Haifeng Zhang; Xiyuan Mao; Zijing Du; Wenbo Jiang; Xiuguo Han; Danyang Zhao; Dong Han; Qingfeng Li
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 8.  Demineralized bone matrix in bone repair: history and use.

Authors:  Elliott Gruskin; Bruce A Doll; F William Futrell; John P Schmitz; Jeffrey O Hollinger
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Microparticulate cortical allograft: an alternative to autograft in the treatment of osseous defects.

Authors:  H Thomas Temple; Theodore I Malinin
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-05-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.