R Mazhari1, J H Omens, R S Pavelec, J W Covell, A D McCulloch. 1. Department of Bioengineering, The Whitaker Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regional function in stunned myocardium is usually thought to be more depressed in the endocardium than the epicardium. This has been attributed to the greater loss of blood flow at the endocardium during ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured transmural distributions of 3D systolic strains relative to local myofiber axes in open-chest anesthetized dogs before 15 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and during 2 hours of reperfusion. During ischemia, regional myocardial blood flow was reduced 84% at the endocardium and 32% at the epicardium (P<0.005, n=7), but changes in end-systolic fiber length from baseline were transmurally uniform. Relative to baseline, radial segments in stunned tissue were significantly thinner at the endocardium than the epicardium at end systole (24+/-5% versus 16+/-3%; P<0.05, n=8), consistent with previous reports. Unlike radial and cross-fiber segments, however, the increase of end-systolic fiber lengths in stunned myocardium had no significant transmural gradient (23+/-8% epicardium versus 21+/-4% endocardium). We also observed significant 3D diastolic dysfunction in the ischemic-reperfused region transmurally. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion in the dog results in a significant transmural gradient of dysfunction between epicardial and endocardial layers in radial and cross-fiber segments, but not for fiber segments, despite a gradient in blood flow reduction during ischemia. Perhaps systolic fiber dysfunction rather than the degree of perfusion deficit during the preceding ischemic period may be the main determinant of myocardial dysfunction during reperfusion.
BACKGROUND: Regional function in stunned myocardium is usually thought to be more depressed in the endocardium than the epicardium. This has been attributed to the greater loss of blood flow at the endocardium during ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured transmural distributions of 3D systolic strains relative to local myofiber axes in open-chest anesthetized dogs before 15 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and during 2 hours of reperfusion. During ischemia, regional myocardial blood flow was reduced 84% at the endocardium and 32% at the epicardium (P<0.005, n=7), but changes in end-systolic fiber length from baseline were transmurally uniform. Relative to baseline, radial segments in stunned tissue were significantly thinner at the endocardium than the epicardium at end systole (24+/-5% versus 16+/-3%; P<0.05, n=8), consistent with previous reports. Unlike radial and cross-fiber segments, however, the increase of end-systolic fiber lengths in stunned myocardium had no significant transmural gradient (23+/-8% epicardium versus 21+/-4% endocardium). We also observed significant 3D diastolic dysfunction in the ischemic-reperfused region transmurally. CONCLUSIONS:Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion in the dog results in a significant transmural gradient of dysfunction between epicardial and endocardial layers in radial and cross-fiber segments, but not for fiber segments, despite a gradient in blood flow reduction during ischemia. Perhaps systolic fiber dysfunction rather than the degree of perfusion deficit during the preceding ischemic period may be the main determinant of myocardial dysfunction during reperfusion.
Authors: Giuseppe Caracciolo; Mackram F Eleid; Haruhiko Abe; Nisha Bhatia; F David Fortuin; Susan Wilansky; Scipione Carerj; Partho P Sengupta Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Ben T Esch; Jessica M Scott; Darren E R Warburton; Richard Thompson; Dylan Taylor; June Cheng Baron; Ian Paterson; Mark J Haykowsky Journal: J Physiol Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Stuart G Campbell; Elliot Howard; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Benjamin A Coppola; Jeffrey H Omens; Lawrence J Mulligan; Andrew D McCulloch; Roy C P Kerckhoffs Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 2.969
Authors: Reza Avazmohammadi; Joao S Soares; David S Li; Thomas Eperjesi; James Pilla; Robert C Gorman; Michael S Sacks Journal: J Biomech Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Kieren G Hollingsworth; Guy A Macgowan; Louise Morris; Matthew G D Bates; Roy Taylor; David E J Jones; Julia L Newton; Andrew M Blamire Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-03-29
Authors: Jiří Plášek; Tomáš Rychlý; Diana Drieniková; Ondřej Cisovský; Tomáš Grézl; Miroslav Homza; Jan Václavík Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Stuart G Campbell; Sarah N Flaim; Chae H Leem; Andrew D McCulloch Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2008-09-28 Impact factor: 4.226