Literature DB >> 11457628

Predictive validity of a screen for partner violence against women.

J Koziol-McLain1, C J Coates, S R Lowenstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While public health leaders recommend screening for partner violence, the predictive value of this practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a brief three-question violence screen to predict violence against women in the ensuing months.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult women participating in the Colorado Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a population-based, random-digit-dialing telephone survey. During 8 monthly cohorts, 695 women participated in the BRFSS; 409 women participated in follow-up telephone interviews approximately 4 months later. Violent events during the follow-up period, measured using a modified 28-item Conflict Tactics Scale, were compared between women who initially screened positive and those who screened negative.
RESULTS: Among BRFSS respondents, 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=6.3%-10.5%) had an initial positive screen. During the follow-up period, women who screened positive were 46.5 times (5.4-405) more likely to experience severe physical violence, 11.7 times (5.0- 27.3) more likely to experience physical violence, 3.6 (2.4-5.2) times more likely to experience verbal aggression, and 2.5 times (1.2-5.1) more likely to experience sexual coercion. In a multivariate model, separation from one's spouse and a positive screen were significant independent predictors of physical violence.
CONCLUSIONS: A brief violence screen identifies a subset of women at high risk for verbal, physical, and sexual partner abuse over the following 4 months. Women with a positive screen who are separated from their spouse are at highest risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11457628     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00325-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  13 in total

1.  Public health education for emergency medicine residents.

Authors:  Marian E Betz; Steven L Bernstein; Deborah C Gutman; Carrie D Tibbles; Nina R Joyce; Robert I Lipton; Lisa M Schweigler; Jonathan Fisher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Prevention of violence against women: recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors:  C Nadine Wathen; Harriet L MacMillan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Abuse experiences, substance use, and reproductive health in women seeking care at an emergency department.

Authors:  Melissa A Sutherland; Heidi Collins Fantasia; Natalie McClain
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Clinical utility of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients.

Authors:  Katherine M Iverson; Matthew W King; Patricia A Resick; Megan R Gerber; Rachel Kimerling; Dawne Vogt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Ascertainment of intimate partner violence using two abuse measurement frameworks.

Authors:  A E Bonomi; R S Thompson; M Anderson; F P Rivara; V L Holt; D Carrell; D P Martin
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Can a health clinic-based intervention increase safety in abused women? Results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Tameka L Gillum; Christina J Sun; Anne B Woods
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Policymaking Under Uncertainty: Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence.

Authors:  Rada K Dagher; Mary A Garza; Katy Backes Kozhimannil
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2014-07-10

8.  Risk and Protective Factors for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Prospective-Longitudinal Studies.

Authors:  Alexa R Yakubovich; Heidi Stöckl; Joseph Murray; G J Melendez-Torres; Janina I Steinert; Calla E Y Glavin; David K Humphreys
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Risk factors associated with different types of intimate partner violence (IPV): an emergency department study.

Authors:  Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Eunjin Kim; Johnny Lin; Alireza Ahmadi; Mojdeh T Khamesi; Stacey Teruya
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Development and validation of the Domestic Violence during Quarantine Scale (DVQS).

Authors:  Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh; Kamel Abdi; Abbas Ebadi; Borhan Moradveisi; Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini; Hosein Zahednezhad
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.