Literature DB >> 11456002

Trends in births to parents of two different races in the United States: 1971-1995.

J O Atkinson1, M F MacDorman, J D Parker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 1997, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) introduced revised standards for classification of federal data on race. The new standards include the option to report more than one race. Reasons for the new standards include a change over time in childbearing patterns by race.
OBJECTIVE: To better understand how the new standards could impact different racial groups, we examined trends in interracial births in the United States from 1971-1995.
DESIGN: Birth certificate data were used to analyze over 36,000,000 US births from 1971-1995. Race of mother and race of father were divided into four categories (Black, White, American Indian, and Asian or Pacific-Islander), and four Asian or Pacific-Islander subcategories (Chinese, Japanese, Hawaiian, Filipino). The national percent of interracial births was calculated by race of parents for five-year intervals.
RESULTS: The percent of interracial births in the United States more than tripled from the 1971-1975 period to the 1991-1995 period, but remained relatively small overall (3.9% in 1991-95). The percent of interracial births increased most dramatically among Black (from 0.8% to 4.0%) and White (0.8% to 2.6%) mothers, but these births were much more common among American Indian and Asian or Pacific-Islander (47% and 22% in 1991-1995, respectively) mothers. Nearly half (45%) of all interracial births occurred to White-Black parents, followed by White-Asian or Pacific-Islander parents (33%).
CONCLUSION: Future statistical reporting of demographic and health characteristics by race of American Indian and Asian or Pacific-Islander populations could be impacted the most by the new OMB standards. For Whites and Blacks, the impact of multiracial reporting will be smaller, but is likely to increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11456002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   1.847


  5 in total

1.  The correspondence between interracial births and multiple-race reporting.

Authors:  Jennifer D Parker; Jennifer H Madans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Perinatal outcomes for Asian, Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander mothers of single and multiple race/ethnicity: California and Hawaii, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Ashley H Schempf; Pauline Mendola; Brady E Hamilton; Donald K Hayes; Diane M Makuc
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  How have researchers studied multiracial populations? A content and methodological review of 20 years of research.

Authors:  Linda Charmaraman; Meghan Woo; Ashley Quach; Sumru Erkut
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2014-07

4.  Validity of infant race/ethnicity from birth certificates in the context of U.S. demographic change.

Authors:  Lisa Reyes Mason; Yunju Nam; Youngmi Kim
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Patients' attitudes toward health care providers collecting information about their race and ethnicity.

Authors:  David W Baker; Kenzie A Cameron; Joseph Feinglass; Patricia Georgas; Shawn Foster; Deborah Pierce; Jason A Thompson; Romana Hasnain-Wynia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.