Is the postretention relapse of maxillary and mandibular incisor alignment related?

Previous studies suggest a poor association between initial and postretention pattern of incisor irregularity. One explanation may be that the incisor movements are limited by the boundaries provided by the incisors in the opposite arch. If so, postretention malalignment of the maxillary and mandibular incisors may be related. To test this hypothesis, long-term postretention study models of 96 patients with acceptable occlusion at the time of appliance removal were examined. The occlusal surfaces of the postretention study models were photocopied, and tooth anatomical contact points were digitized. An algorithm was used to fit the dental arch to the digitized points. The amount of incisor rotation and anatomical contact point displacement of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth, relative to their respective dental arches, were computer generated. Overbite, the number of occlusal contact points in the anterior segment, and concavity of the lingual surfaces of the maxillary incisors were recorded manually. Statistical analyses demonstrated a significant association (P <.05) between the overall irregularity of the maxillary and mandibular incisors. The association did not differ among subgroups that were stratified according to overbite or number of occlusal contacts. No associations were found for the overall amount of incisor rotation in the 2 arches (P >.05). The amount and direction of displacement of antagonistic pairs of maxillary and mandibular central incisors were also associated (P <.05), but not the amount and direction of rotation (P >.05). The lingual configuration of the maxillary incisors did not affect the pattern of mandibular incisor malalignment.