Literature DB >> 11454502

Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial.

M J Steiner1, I Hertz-Picciotto, D Taylor, V Schoenbach, A Wheeless.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how well information at enrollment would predict coital frequency and menstrual segment length during a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial.
METHODS: We compared retrospective reports of monthly coital frequency and menstrual segment (cycle) length with prospective information for women participating in a contraceptive trial of the Reality((R)) female condom.
RESULTS: Participants reported slightly higher mean monthly coital frequency and slightly longer menstrual segments prior to the study than during the study (12.6 acts vs. 12.0 acts per month and 30.8 days vs. 28.4 days). We examined the actual distribution of differences between the retrospective and prospective measures and found considerable variability. Among the 195 participants studied, parous women were less likely to predict accurately menstrual segment length (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3--0.9), while older women were more likely to predict accurately coital frequency (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.9--3.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Coital frequency and menstrual segment length vary considerably over time. Hence, prospective data collection is essential to accurately characterize these variations and to properly interpret results from contraceptive trials and other studies concerned with fecundability and hazards of reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11454502     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00248-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of Sexual Intercourse Frequency Among Couples Trying to Conceive.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  The menstrual cycle and anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: implications of menstrual cycle variability.

Authors:  Jason D Vescovi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comparison of prospective and retrospective measurements of frequency of sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Larissa R Brunner Huber; Jordan E Lyerly; Ashley M Young; Jacek Dmochowski; Tara M Vick; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-08

4.  Accuracy of reporting of menstrual cycle length.

Authors:  Anne Marie Zaura Jukic; Clarice R Weinberg; Allen J Wilcox; D Robert McConnaughey; Paige Hornsby; Donna D Baird
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Association of severity of menstrual dysfunction with hyperinsulinemia and dysglycemia in polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  U Ezeh; M D Pisarska; R Azziz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Limited Evidence Suggests a Protective Association Between Oral Contraceptive Pill Use and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Females: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathleen Samuelson; Ethan M Balk; Erika L Sevetson; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.843

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.