Literature DB >> 11454286

Lift generation by the avian tail.

W J Maybury1, J M Rayner, L B Couldrick.   

Abstract

Variation with tail spread of the lift generated by a bird tail was measured on mounted, frozen European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in a wind tunnel at a typical air speed and body and tail angle of attack in order to test predictions of existing aerodynamic theories modelling tail lift. Measured lift at all but the lowest tail spread angles was significantly lower than the predictions of slender wing, leading edge vortex and lifting line models of lift production. Instead, the tail lift coefficient based on tail area was independent of tail spread, tail aspect ratio and maximum tail span. Theoretical models do not predict bird tail lift reliably and, when applied to tail morphology, may underestimate the aerodynamic optimum tail feather length. Flow visualization experiments reveal that an isolated tail generates leading edge vortices as expected for a low-aspect ratio delta wing, but that in the intact bird body-tail interactions are critical in determining tail aerodynamics: lifting vortices shed from the body interact with the tail and degrade tail lift compared with that of an isolated tail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11454286      PMCID: PMC1088761          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  How do birds' tails work? Delta-wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight.

Authors:  Matthew R Evans; Mikael Rosén; Kirsty J Park; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Birds' tails do act like delta wings but delta-wing theory does not always predict the forces they generate.

Authors:  Matthew R Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A passerine spreads its tail to facilitate a rapid recovery of its body posture during hovering.

Authors:  Jian-Yuan Su; Shang-Chieh Ting; Yu-Hung Chang; Jing-Tang Yang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Predicting power-optimal kinematics of avian wings.

Authors:  Ben Parslew
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Aerodynamic evaluation of wing shape and wing orientation in four butterfly species using numerical simulations and a low-speed wind tunnel, and its implications for the design of flying micro-robots.

Authors:  Alejandro Ortega Ancel; Rodney Eastwood; Daniel Vogt; Carter Ithier; Michael Smith; Rob Wood; Mirko Kovač
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Forest stratification shapes allometry and flight morphology of tropical butterflies.

Authors:  Sebastián Mena; Krzysztof M Kozak; Rafael E Cárdenas; María F Checa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Future Tail Tales: A Forward-Looking, Integrative Perspective on Tail Research.

Authors:  M J Schwaner; S T Hsieh; I Braasch; S Bradley; C B Campos; C E Collins; C M Donatelli; F E Fish; O E Fitch; B E Flammang; B E Jackson; A Jusufi; P J Mekdara; A Patel; B J Swalla; M Vickaryous; C P McGowan
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  A potential role for bat tail membranes in flight control.

Authors:  James D Gardiner; Grigorios Dimitriadis; Jonathan R Codd; Robert L Nudds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  From dinosaurs to birds: a tail of evolution.

Authors:  Dana J Rashid; Susan C Chapman; Hans Ce Larsson; Chris L Organ; Anne-Gaelle Bebin; Christa S Merzdorf; Roger Bradley; John R Horner
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Sexual Dimorphism and Population Differences in Structural Properties of Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) Wing and Tail Feathers.

Authors:  Péter L Pap; Gergely Osváth; José Miguel Aparicio; Lőrinc Bărbos; Piotr Matyjasiak; Diego Rubolini; Nicola Saino; Csongor I Vágási; Orsolya Vincze; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.