P T Sawicki1, A Siebenhofer. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, St Franziskus Hospital in Cologne, Germany. peter.sawicki@t-online.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Betablockers have been convincingly shown to reduce total and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of hypertensive diabetic patients. In diabetic patients, after myocardial infarction, these agents confer a twice as high protective effect when compared to non-diabetic patients. However, most paradoxically, betablocking agents are used less frequently in diabetes. Control of hypertension is insufficient in most of the diabetic patients, probably because a combination of antihypertensive agents including betablockers is frequently needed to sufficiently control blood pressure but is not used in these patients. The fear of betablocker-associated side effects in diabetes may be partly responsible for the frequent antihypertensive mono-therapy and the resulting poor quality of blood pressure control among diabetic patients. DESIGN: We have performed an analysis of the literature to assess whether possible adverse metabolic effects, a higher risk of hypoglycaemia or less nephroprotective effects of beta1-selective betablocking agents could justify the reticence in prescribing these antihypertensive agents to diabetic patients. RESULTS: A thorough review of the literature does not indicate that beta1-selective betablocking agents have important adverse effects on glucose metabolism, prolong hypoglycaemia or mask hypoglycaemic symptoms. In diabetic nephropathy, betablockers are as nephroprotective as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The unnecessary less frequent prescription of beta1-selective betablockers in diabetes mellitus may contribute to the higher cardiovascular mortality among these patients.
OBJECTIVES: Betablockers have been convincingly shown to reduce total and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of hypertensive diabeticpatients. In diabeticpatients, after myocardial infarction, these agents confer a twice as high protective effect when compared to non-diabeticpatients. However, most paradoxically, betablocking agents are used less frequently in diabetes. Control of hypertension is insufficient in most of the diabeticpatients, probably because a combination of antihypertensive agents including betablockers is frequently needed to sufficiently control blood pressure but is not used in these patients. The fear of betablocker-associated side effects in diabetes may be partly responsible for the frequent antihypertensive mono-therapy and the resulting poor quality of blood pressure control among diabeticpatients. DESIGN: We have performed an analysis of the literature to assess whether possible adverse metabolic effects, a higher risk of hypoglycaemia or less nephroprotective effects of beta1-selective betablocking agents could justify the reticence in prescribing these antihypertensive agents to diabeticpatients. RESULTS: A thorough review of the literature does not indicate that beta1-selective betablocking agents have important adverse effects on glucose metabolism, prolong hypoglycaemia or mask hypoglycaemic symptoms. In diabetic nephropathy, betablockers are as nephroprotective as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The unnecessary less frequent prescription of beta1-selective betablockers in diabetes mellitus may contribute to the higher cardiovascular mortality among these patients.
Authors: Ram D Pathak; Emily B Schroeder; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Chan Zeng; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Abraham Thomas; Jay Desai; Beth Waitzfelder; Gregory A Nichols; Jean M Lawrence; Andrew J Karter; John F Steiner; Jodi Segal; Patrick J O'Connor Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Alexandra K Lee; Clare J Lee; Elbert S Huang; A Richey Sharrett; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 19.112