Literature DB >> 11453903

A retrospective analysis of contact allergy to lanolin.

S H Wakelin1, H Smith, I R White, R J Rycroft, J P McFadden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lanolin is often stated to be an important sensitizer but some of the available literature is based on the analysis of high-risk patients.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the frequency of contact allergy to lanolin (wool alcohols) in a central London teaching hospital patch-test population.
METHODS: Review of 24,449 patients recorded on our database during 1982--96 who were tested with a standard series containing 30% wool alcohols.
RESULTS: The mean annual rate of sensitivity to this allergen was 1.7%. The wool alcohols-allergic group contained a higher proportion of females (P < 0.05), and the mean age of both males and females (48.4 and 49.2 years) was higher than that of non-wool alcohols-allergic patients (41.4 and 35.9 years; P < 0.0005). There was no difference in atopic eczema status between these groups. The highest prevalence of allergy to wool alcohols was among patients with lower leg dermatitis (6.0%; 95% confidence interval, CI 4.46--7.54), followed by those with anogenital dermatitis (3.23%; 95% CI 1.81--4.65). There was an unexplained decline in the rate of positive patch tests to Amerchol L-101. However, some patients who reacted to this were negative with wool alcohols, so it may be a useful additional test reagent. The mean rates of allergy to Eucerin (0.65% per annum) and 50% hydrogenated lanolin in petrolatum (1% per annum) were low, and we no longer use these as test reagents.
CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates that lanolin sensitization has remained at a relatively low and constant rate even in a high-risk population (i.e. patients with recent or active eczema).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11453903     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  8 in total

1.  Antiperspirant and deodorant allergy: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Matthew J Zirwas; Jessica Moennich
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2008-09

2.  Efficacy of lanolin and bovine type I collagen in the treatment of childhood anal fissures: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Behçet Ilker Büyükyavuz; Cagri Savaş; Levent Duman
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Contact Dermatitis in the Elderly: Predisposing Factors, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Lima; Vanessa Timmermann; Tanja Illing; Peter Elsner
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Contact dermatitis in children.

Authors:  Paolo Pigatto; Alberto Martelli; Chiara Marsili; Alessandro Fiocchi
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.638

5.  Efficacy of HPA Lanolin® in treatment of lip alterations related to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos; José Endrigo Tinôco-Araújo; Lucas Monteiro de Vasconcelos Alves de Souza; Rafael Ferreira; Maura Rosane Valério Ikoma; Ana Paula Ribeiro Razera; Márcia Mirolde Magno de Carvalho Santos
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101.

Authors:  Jannet Knijp; Derk P Bruynzeel; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Emollient treatment of atopic dermatitis: latest evidence and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Kam Lun Hon; Jeng Sum Charmaine Kung; Wing Gi Gigi Ng; Ting Fan Leung
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2018-04-17

8.  Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.

Authors:  Ada Uldahl; Malin Engfeldt; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.