Literature DB >> 11453676

The two PM(2.5) (fine) and PM(2.5-10) (coarse) fractions: evidence of different biological activity.

M Diociaiuti1, M Balduzzi, B De Berardis, G Cattani, G Stacchini, G Ziemacki, A Marconi, L Paoletti.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that an increased concentration of environmental particulate matter (PM(10)) is related to many respiratory diseases. One major issue is whether the toxicity of the particles resides in some particular fraction as defined by chemical composition and size. The overall purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro toxicity of coarse (PM(2.5-10)) and fine (PM(2.5)) particulate matter, collected in an urban area of Rome, in relation to their physicochemical composition as assessed by analytic electron microscopy and atomic absorption spectroscopy. In particular, our aim was to evaluate the importance of particle physicochemical components in the induced toxicity. The in vitro toxicity assays used included human red blood cell hemolysis, cell viability, and nitric oxide (NO) release in the RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line. The hemolytic potential has been widely used as an in vitro toxicity screen and as a useful indicator of oxidative damage to biomembranes. We found that human erythrocytes underwent dose-dependent hemolysis when they were incubated with varying concentrations of fine and coarse particles. The hemolytic potential was greater for the fine particles than for the coarse particles in equal mass concentration. However, when data were expressed in terms of PM surface per volume unit of suspension, the two fractions did not show any significant hemolytic differences. This result suggested that the oxidative stress induced by PM on the cell membranes could be due mainly to the interaction between the particle surfaces and the cell membranes. RAW 264.7 macrophage cells challenged with particles showed decreased viability and an increased release of NO, a key inflammatory mediator, and both effects were not dose dependent in the tested concentration range. The fine particles were the most effective and the differences between the two size fractions in inducing these biological effects remained unchanged when the basis of comparison was changed from weight to surface measures. It seemed therefore that these differences relied on the different physicochemical nature of the particles. The main chemical difference between the two fractions resided in a greater abundance of C-rich particles with S traces in the fine fraction. Therefore, we cautiously suggest a role for these particles in the induction of toxicity. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11453676     DOI: 10.1006/enrs.2001.4275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  15 in total

1.  Nanoparticle-induced platelet aggregation and vascular thrombosis.

Authors:  Anna Radomski; Paul Jurasz; David Alonso-Escolano; Magdalena Drews; Maria Morandi; Tadeusz Malinski; Marek W Radomski
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Characterization of chemical components and cytotoxicity effects of indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Xi'an, China.

Authors:  Xinyi Niu; Kin Fai Ho; Tafeng Hu; Jian Sun; Jing Duan; Yu Huang; Ka Hei Lui; Junji Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effect of collection methods on combustion particle physicochemical properties and their biological response in a human macrophage-like cell line.

Authors:  Kamaljeet Kaur; Isabel C Jaramillo; Raziye Mohammadpour; Anne Sturrock; Hamidreza Ghandehari; Christopher Reilly; Robert Paine; Kerry E Kelly
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.269

4.  Biodiesel from soybean promotes cell proliferation in vitro.

Authors:  Adriana Gioda; Rosa I Rodríguez-Cotto; Beatriz Silva Amaral; Jarline Encarnación-Medina; Mario G Ortiz-Martínez; Braulio D Jiménez-Vélez
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Concentrations of Ni and V, other heavy metals, arsenic, elemental and organic carbon in atmospheric fine particles (PM2.5) from Puerto Rico.

Authors:  David Acevedo Figueroa; Carlos J Rodríguez-Sierra; Braulio D Jiménez-Velez
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 6.  Effects of atmospheric pollutants on the Nrf2 survival pathway.

Authors:  Valentina Rubio; Mahara Valverde; Emilio Rojas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Mass size distribution and chemical composition of the surface layer of summer and winter airborne particles in Zabrze, Poland.

Authors:  Krzysztof Klejnowski; Jozef S Pastuszka; Wioletta Rogula-Kozłowska; Ewa Talik; Andrzej Krasa
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Biologic effects induced in vitro by PM10 from three different zones of Mexico City.

Authors:  Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno; Leticia Martínez; Claudia García-Cuellar; James C Bonner; J Clifford Murray; Irma Rosas; Sergio Ponce de León Rosales; Alvaro R Osornio-Vargas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Cardiovascular effects in patrol officers are associated with fine particulate matter from brake wear and engine emissions.

Authors:  Michael Riediker; Robert B Devlin; Thomas R Griggs; Margaret C Herbst; Philip A Bromberg; Ronald W Williams; Wayne E Cascio
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Proinflammatory and cytotoxic effects of Mexico City air pollution particulate matter in vitro are dependent on particle size and composition.

Authors:  Alvaro R Osornio-Vargas; James C Bonner; Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno; Leticia Martínez; Claudia García-Cuellar; Sergio Ponce-de-León Rosales; Javier Miranda; Irma Rosas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.