Literature DB >> 11453304

Mode of action and tissue dosimetry in current and future risk assessments.

M E Andersen1, J E Dennison.   

Abstract

Two fundamental concepts have emerged to organize contemporary approaches to chemical risk assessment - mode of action and tissue dosimetry. Mode of action specifies the nature of the interactions between the chemical and the body that lead to toxic responses and should, under optimal circumstances, also specify the form of the tissue dose that leads to these effects. This paper highlights recent development of biologically based dose response (BBDR) models for specific toxic endpoints that use knowledge on mode of action to specify measures of dose. These dose measures then are used to support low dose and interspecies extrapolations. We first focus on a series of dose response models developed for several compounds that produce nasal toxicity. These examples demonstrate a range of model structures from simple dosimetry models (methylmethacrylate) to linkage of dosimetry with specific biological processes involved in carcinogenesis (formaldehyde). Two BBDR models with dioxin illustrate the organization of biological and dosimetry information into specific testable hypotheses that could distinguish these different models and lead to a more uniform approach to risk assessment for this compound. A final section discusses the impact of molecular biology and the genomic revolution in relation to development of BBDR models for specific toxic endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11453304     DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00744-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  On use of the multistage dose-response model for assessing laboratory animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Development of PBPK model of molinate and molinate sulfoxide in rats and humans.

Authors:  Andrew Campbell
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 3.  Molecular circuits, biological switches, and nonlinear dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Raymond S H Yang; C Tenley French; Laura S Chubb; James E Dennison
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Developmental neurotoxicity of pyrethroid insecticides: critical review and future research needs.

Authors:  Timothy J Shafer; Douglas A Meyer; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Arwa B Raies; Vladimir B Bajic
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2016-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.