OBJECTIVE: To test whether a disclosure intervention improves subjective health and reduces medical consumption and sick leave in somatising patients in general practice. DESIGN: Non-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 10 general practices in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 161 patients who frequently attended general practice with somatising symptoms. INTERVENTION: Patients in the intervention group were visited two to three times and invited to disclose emotionally important events in their life. Control patients received normal care from their general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of medical services (drugs and healthcare visits), subjective health, and sick leave assessed by self completion questionnaires after 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 137 completed the trial (85%). Both groups were comparable at baseline. The intervention had no effect on the main outcome measures at any point. Intervention patients made one more visit to health care (95% confidence interval -4 to 6); the use of medicines did not change in both groups (-1 to 1); subjective health improved 3.6 points more in the control group (-11.2 to 4.3); and disclosure patients were on sick leave one more week (-1 to 3). Patients often had a depression or anxiety disorder for which they were not receiving adequate care. CONCLUSION: Although the intervention was well received by patients and doctors, disclosure had no effect on the health of somatising patients in general practice.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test whether a disclosure intervention improves subjective health and reduces medical consumption and sick leave in somatising patients in general practice. DESIGN: Non-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 10 general practices in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 161 patients who frequently attended general practice with somatising symptoms. INTERVENTION: Patients in the intervention group were visited two to three times and invited to disclose emotionally important events in their life. Control patients received normal care from their general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of medical services (drugs and healthcare visits), subjective health, and sick leave assessed by self completion questionnaires after 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 137 completed the trial (85%). Both groups were comparable at baseline. The intervention had no effect on the main outcome measures at any point. Intervention patients made one more visit to health care (95% confidence interval -4 to 6); the use of medicines did not change in both groups (-1 to 1); subjective health improved 3.6 points more in the control group (-11.2 to 4.3); and disclosure patients were on sick leave one more week (-1 to 3). Patients often had a depression or anxiety disorder for which they were not receiving adequate care. CONCLUSION: Although the intervention was well received by patients and doctors, disclosure had no effect on the health of somatising patients in general practice.
Authors: P J Portegijs; F G van der Horst; I M Proot; H F Kraan; N C Gunther; J A Knottnerus Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Joanna Leaviss; Sarah Davis; Shijie Ren; Jean Hamilton; Alison Scope; Andrew Booth; Anthea Sutton; Glenys Parry; Marta Buszewicz; Rona Moss-Morris; Peter White Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.014