Literature DB >> 11451492

An in vivo/in vitro comparison with a leuprolide osmotic implant for the treatment of prostate cancer.

J C Wright1, S Tao Leonard, C L Stevenson, J C Beck, G Chen, R M Jao, P A Johnson, J Leonard, R J Skowronski.   

Abstract

An osmotically driven implantable system was designed and characterized for the delivery of leuprolide over a year-long duration. Leuprolide has been used in the treatment of prostate cancer since the 1980s. The DUROS implant consists of a titanium alloy cylinder, measures 4 mm in diameter by 45 mm in length and holds approximately 150 microl of formulation. Stability studies indicated that leuprolide was stable, as a solution formulation in DMSO, for several years at 37 degrees C. In vitro release rate testing, at weekly intervals, showed zero-order delivery for 1 year. DUROS implants demonstrated release rates that were reproducible and similar to one another after storage at 25 degrees C for 18 months prior to testing. In vivo studies, with implants placed subcutaneously, revealed delivery rates comparable to those observed under in vitro conditions. Leuprolide stability was also comparable between in vivo and in vitro conditions. Steady leuprolide serum levels produced by the implant resulted in the desired pharmacodynamic efficacy endpoint of testosterone suppression, both in canines and in humans. The good agreement between in vivo/in vitro delivery rates was as expected for a delivery system based on the principles of osmosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451492     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00358-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  10 in total

Review 1.  Critical variables associated with nonbiodegradable osmotically controlled implants.

Authors:  Jeremy C Wright
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Nanochannel technology for constant delivery of chemotherapeutics: beyond metronomic administration.

Authors:  Alessandro Grattoni; Haifa Shen; Daniel Fine; Arturas Ziemys; Jaskaran S Gill; Lee Hudson; Sharath Hosali; Randy Goodall; Xuewu Liu; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Enabling individualized therapy through nanotechnology.

Authors:  Jason H Sakamoto; Anne L van de Ven; Biana Godin; Elvin Blanco; Rita E Serda; Alessandro Grattoni; Arturas Ziemys; Ali Bouamrani; Tony Hu; Shivakumar I Ranganathan; Enrica De Rosa; Jonathan O Martinez; Christine A Smid; Rachel M Buchanan; Sei-Young Lee; Srimeenakshi Srinivasan; Matthew Landry; Anne Meyn; Ennio Tasciotti; Xuewu Liu; Paolo Decuzzi; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 4.  Long-term delivery of protein therapeutics.

Authors:  Ravi Vaishya; Varun Khurana; Sulabh Patel; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  Zero-order controlled release of ciprofloxacin-HCl from a reservoir-based, bioresorbable and elastomeric device.

Authors:  Irene S Tobias; Heejin Lee; George C Engelmayr; Daniel Macaya; Christopher J Bettinger; Michael J Cima
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Reservoir-based drug delivery systems utilizing microtechnology.

Authors:  Cynthia L Stevenson; John T Santini; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Future of sustained protein delivery.

Authors:  Ravi Vaishya; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2014-11

8.  DUROS technology delivers peptides and proteins at consistent rate continuously for 3 to 12 months.

Authors:  Catherine M Rohloff; Thomas R Alessi; Bing Yang; Janice Dahms; John P Carr; Scott D Lautenbach
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

Review 9.  Microfabrication for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Brendan Koch; Ilaria Rubino; Fu-Shi Quan; Bongyoung Yoo; Hyo-Jick Choi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Implantable Devices for Sustained, Intravesical Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Seung Ho Lee; Young Bin Choy
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.835

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.