Literature DB >> 11451352

Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration.

F Eustache1, P Jouannet, J Auger.   

Abstract

Human sperm concentration is usually assessed using hemocytometry (HM). However, external and internal quality control schemes have shown that the accuracy of this method is low overall. Flow cytometry (FC) is a rapid, accurate, and reproducible technology for the quantification of various cell populations. We used 3 FC methods for human sperm counting from a 1:1 mixture of a diluted semen sample with a suspension of fluorospheres of known concentrations. The events that represented sperm cells were detected according to 1) gating on size and granularity (FCM1), 2) gating on DNA staining by propidium iodide (FCM2), and 3) a combination of FCM1 and FCM2 (FCM3). Sperm concentration was calculated from the ratio of detected events to fluorosphere counts and fluorosphere concentration. A pilot study undertaken by 12 technicians from different laboratories to compare FCM1 with HM showed a general agreement between both methods, despite wide variations in sperm concentration exhibited by HM due to the use of unoptimized procedures. A second experiment indicated that the overall variability in sperm concentration assessment by FCM1 was lower than that produced by HM when performed by 2 technicians using optimal procedures for 3 preparations of the same semen samples. The overall mean coefficients of variation were 3.9% for FCM1 vs 8.0% for technician 1, 12.3% for technician 2 (P < .05), and 15.7% for both technicians (P < .05). FCM1, FCM2, and FCM3 were compared with HM performed by a single trained technician for 39 semen samples (triplicates) of various quality. Compared with HM, FCM1 and FCM2 overestimated the sperm concentration by 14% and 8%, respectively, against only 4% per million sperm for FCM3, which was effective for the full spectrum of sperm concentrations (except azoospermia). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that human sperm concentration can be accurately assessed by the FC method combining gating on cell size, granularity, and DNA staining.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  6 in total

1.  Proteomic identification of in vivo substrates for matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 reveals a mechanism for resolution of inflammation.

Authors:  Kendra J Greenlee; David B Corry; David A Engler; Risë K Matsunami; Philippe Tessier; Richard G Cook; Zena Werb; Farrah Kheradmand
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Determination of sperm concentration using flow cytometry with simultaneous analysis of sperm plasma membrane integrity in zebrafish Danio rerio.

Authors:  Huiping Yang; Jonathan Daly; Terrence R Tiersch
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Evaluation of the expression of sperm proteins in normozoospermic and asthenozoospermic men using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Jana Capkova; Alena Kubatova; Lukas Ded; Olina Tepla; Jana Peknicova
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Sperm concentration measurement with a disposable counting chamber.

Authors:  Mathilde Lemoine; Xavier Ferraretto; Marie-Astrid Llabador-de Royer; Achraf Benammar; Jacques Darolles; Sylvie Epelboin; Florence Eustache; Catherine Patrat
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Use of flow cytometry for high-throughput cell population estimates in brain tissue.

Authors:  Nicole A Young; David K Flaherty; David C Airey; Peter Varlan; Feyi Aworunse; Jon H Kaas; Christine E Collins
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.856

6.  Microfluidic Chips for Semen Analysis.

Authors:  L I Segerink; A J Sprenkels; G J E Oosterhuis; I Vermes; A van den Berg
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2012-10-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.