Literature DB >> 11451349

Understanding the odds ratio and the relative risk.

S D Simon1.   

Abstract

Both the odds ratio and the relative risk compare the relative likelihood of an event occurring between two groups. The relative risk is easier to interpret and is consistent with general intuition. Some designs, however, allow only for the calculation of the odds ration. Covariate adjustment is easier for an odds ratio. Finally, the odds ratio avoids ambiguity by being invariant to lthe labeling of the outcome measure. The Table summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the odds ratio and relative risk. Whe reading research that summarizes data using odds ratios, or relative risks, be aware of the limitations of booth of these measures.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  12 in total

1.  Journal Club: comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic persons with Alzheimer disease neuropathology.

Authors:  Jared R Brosch; Brandy R Matthews
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Spirituality and Subjective Religiosity among African Americans, Caribbean Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites.

Authors:  Linda M Chatters; Robert Joseph Taylor; Kai McKeever Bullard; James S Jackson
Journal:  J Sci Study Relig       Date:  2008-12-01

3.  Foot orthoses in lower limb overuse conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis--critical appraisal and commentary.

Authors:  Randy R Richter; Tricia M Austin; Mark F Reinking
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Meta-Analyses of Fraternal and Sororal Birth Order Effects in Homosexual Pedophiles, Hebephiles, and Teleiophiles.

Authors:  Ray Blanchard; Klaus M Beier; Francisco R Gómez Jiménez; Dorit Grundmann; Jurian Krupp; Scott W Semenyna; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-09-07

5.  Costs and treatment patterns of incident ADHD patients - a comparative analysis before and after the initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Mike Klora; Jan Zeidler; Roland Linder; Frank Verheyen; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-12-21

6.  Twitter-derived neighborhood characteristics associated with obesity and diabetes.

Authors:  Quynh C Nguyen; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Weijun Yu; Matt McCullough; Heidi A Hanson; Michelle L Litchman; Feifei Li; Yuan Wan; James A VanDerslice; Ming Wen; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Associations of Food-Chewing Discomfort with Health Behaviors and Cognitive and Physical Health Using Pooled Data from the Korean Health Panel (2010-2013).

Authors:  Sun Mi Shin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Estimating Relative Risk When Observing Zero Events-Frequentist Inference and Bayesian Credibility Intervals.

Authors:  Sören Möller; Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Estimating the risk of developing secondary hematologic malignancies in patients with T1/T2 prostate cancer undergoing diverse treatment modalities: A large population-based study.

Authors:  Xiaofei Mo; Mingge Zhou; Hui Yan; Xueqin Chen; Yuetao Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Assessment of Psychotic Symptoms in Individuals Exposed to Very High or Extreme Altitude: A Field Study.

Authors:  Katharina Hüfner; Fabio Caramazza; Agnieszka E Stawinoga; Evelyn R Pircher Nöckler; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Sanjeeb S Bhandari; Buddha Basnyat; Monika Brodmann Maeder; Giacomo Strapazzon; Iztok Tomazin; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Hermann Brugger
Journal:  High Alt Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.