Literature DB >> 11450994

Comparison of surgical management of thoracic esophageal carcinoma between two referral centers in Japan and China.

W Fang1, H Kato, W Chen, Y Tachimori, H Igaki, H Sato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparison was made between two referral centers, the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Japan and Shanghai Chest Hospital (SCH) in China. The aim was to detect the possible differences between surgical management of thoracic esophageal carcinoma in these two countries and to shed some light on how to improve the therapeutic outcomes at similar institutions.
METHODS: A total of 98 patients (50 from NCCH and 48 from SCH) with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus treated by a single surgeon at either center during January 1997 to July 1999 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Lugol staining and endoscopic ultrasonography were applied routinely at NCCH only. More early diseases, multiple lesions and synchronous tumors of the digestive tract were detected in the NCCH group than in the SCH group. Significantly more stations of lymph nodes were dissected and higher metastatic rates to certain stations were found after more extensive lymphadenectomy in the NCCH group. Operation time was prolonged with significantly more postoperative complication but amount of blood loss or in-hospital mortality was not increased. There was a tendency toward better survival in the NCCH group at 2-year follow-up (70.9% NCCH vs. 56.2% SCH, p = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS: Lugol staining is useful in detecting early diseases or multiple lesions and endoscopic ultrasonography in increasing the knowledge of preoperative evaluation and thus should be recommended. Attention should be paid to more thorough lymph node dissection, especially those lymph node stations with high metastatic rates within the chest and the abdomen and meanwhile avoiding major postoperative complications, so as to improve further the accuracy of tumor staging and therapeutic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11450994     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hye043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

Review 1.  Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition).

Authors:  Hui Li; Wentao Fang; Zhentao Yu; Yousheng Mao; Longqi Chen; Jie He; Tiehua Rong; Chun Chen; Haiquan Chen; Keneng Chen; Ming Du; Yongtao Han; Jian Hu; Jianhua Fu; Xiaobin Hou; Taiqian Gong; Yin Li; Junfeng Liu; Shuoyan Liu; Lijie Tan; Hui Tian; Qun Wang; Jiaqing Xiang; Meiqing Xu; Xin Ye; Bin You; Renquan Zhang; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Y-S Shu; C Sun; W-P Shi; H-C Shi; S-C Lu; K Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Narrow-band imaging without magnification for detecting early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Edson Ide; Fauze Maluf-Filho; Dalton Marques Chaves; Sergio Eiji Matuguma; Paulo Sakai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Endoscopic Detection of Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Achalasia: Narrow-Band Imaging versus Lugol's Staining.

Authors:  Edson Ide; Fred Olavo Aragão Andrade Carneiro; Mariana Souza Varella Frazão; Dalton Marques Chaves; Rubens Antônio Aissar Sallum; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura; Paulo Sakai; Ivan Cecconello; Fauze Maluf-Filho
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.375

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.