Literature DB >> 11450770

Trauma attending in the resuscitation room: does it affect outcome?

J M Porter1, C Ursic.   

Abstract

Although there are no Class I data supporting the regionalization of trauma care the consensus is that trauma centers decrease morbidity and mortality. However, the controversy continues over whether trauma surgeons should be in-house or take call from home. The current literature does not answer the question because in all of the recent studies the attendings who took call from home were in the resuscitation room guiding the care. We believe the correct question is: Does the presence of the trauma attending in the resuscitation room make a difference? At a university-affiliated Level II trauma center data from the trauma registry, resuscitation room flowsheet, and dictated admission notes were reviewed on all patients over a 6-month period. Data points were: attending present in the resuscitation room, standard demographics, resuscitation room time, time to operating room (OR), time to CT scan, length of stay, complications, and mortality. A total of 943 patients were studied with 216 (23%) having the attending present in the resuscitation room and 727 (77%) without the attending present. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, Injury Severity Score, percentage Injury Severity Score greater than 15 (16-17.1%), and mechanism of injury (24-29% penetrating). Of all the data points studied only time to the OR had a statistically significance difference (P < 0.05) with it taking 43.8 minutes (+/-20.1) when the attending was present and 109.4 minutes (+/-107) when the attending was absent. There were also no missed injuries, delays to the OR, or inappropriate workups when the attendings were present. Only the time to the OR reached statistical significance. The time to the OR is indicative of the decision-making process in the resuscitation room, and it is in this area that the attendings' presence is the most useful. Also, we believe that it is important that there were no missed injuries, delays to the OR, or inappropriate workups when the attendings were present in the resuscitation room. This again speaks to the decision-making process. We believe that these data support the need for the attending to be present in the resuscitation room to facilitate accurate and timely decisions regardless of whether they take the call from home or in-house.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11450770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

1.  Involvement of surgical residents in the management of trauma patients in the emergency room: does the presence of an attending physician affect outcomes?

Authors:  Robert Cohen; Bruria Adini; Irina Radomislensky; Adi Givon; Avraham I Rivkind; Kobi Peleg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The Respiratory Rate: A Neglected Triage Tool for Pre-hospital Identification of Trauma Patients.

Authors:  John D Yonge; Phillip Kemp Bohan; Justin J Watson; Christopher R Connelly; Lynn Eastes; Martin A Schreiber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  [Personnel and structural requirements for the shock trauma room management of multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  C A Kühne; S Ruchholtz; S Sauerland; C Waydhas; D Nast-Kolb
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Effects of moving emergency trauma laparotomies from the ED to a dedicated OR.

Authors:  Sigrid Groven; Paal Aksel Naess; Nils Oddvar Skaga; Christine Gaarder
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  History and significance of the trauma resuscitation flow sheet.

Authors:  Julie A Dunn; Thomas J Schroeppel; Michael Metzler; Chris Cribari; Katherine Corey; David R Boyd
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-10-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.