Y M Lo1, W Y Chan, E K Ng, L Y Chan, P B Lai, J S Tam, S C Chung. 1. Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China. loym@cuhk.edu.hk
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated the detectability of EBV DNA in the serum of gastric carcinoma patients in Hong Kong. Previous data have shown that approximately 10% of gastric carcinomas in Hong Kong are associated with EBV. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We recruited 51 patients with gastric carcinoma, 30 patients with gastritis, and 197 apparently healthy controls. For gastric carcinoma patients, blood samples were obtained before surgery. After surgery, the resected tumor samples from the cancer cases were subjected to in situ hybridization for small EBV-encoded RNA (EBER). Serum EBV DNA in all cases was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Serum EBV DNA was detectable in 5 of 5 (100%) EBER-positive gastric carcinoma cases (median concentration, 1063 copies/ml), in 13 of 14 (93%) EBER-negative gastric carcinoma cases with EBER-positive infiltrating lymphocytes (median concentration, 50 copies/ml), and in 0 of 32 (0%) EBER-negative cases. In the nontumor controls, serum EBV DNA was detectable in 7 of 30 (23%) gastritis cases (median concentration, 0 copies/ml) and in 7 of 197 (3.6%) apparently healthy individuals (median concentration, 0 copy/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that serum EBV DNA reflects tumoral EBER status and opens up the possibility that circulating EBV DNA may be used as a tumor marker for the EBER-positive gastric carcinomas. The biological and clinical significance of the presence of low levels of circulating EBV DNA in the minority of gastritis patients and healthy individuals remains to be elucidated.
PURPOSE: We investigated the detectability of EBV DNA in the serum of gastric carcinomapatients in Hong Kong. Previous data have shown that approximately 10% of gastric carcinomas in Hong Kong are associated with EBV. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We recruited 51 patients with gastric carcinoma, 30 patients with gastritis, and 197 apparently healthy controls. For gastric carcinomapatients, blood samples were obtained before surgery. After surgery, the resected tumor samples from the cancer cases were subjected to in situ hybridization for small EBV-encoded RNA (EBER). Serum EBV DNA in all cases was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Serum EBV DNA was detectable in 5 of 5 (100%) EBER-positive gastric carcinoma cases (median concentration, 1063 copies/ml), in 13 of 14 (93%) EBER-negative gastric carcinoma cases with EBER-positive infiltrating lymphocytes (median concentration, 50 copies/ml), and in 0 of 32 (0%) EBER-negative cases. In the nontumor controls, serum EBV DNA was detectable in 7 of 30 (23%) gastritis cases (median concentration, 0 copies/ml) and in 7 of 197 (3.6%) apparently healthy individuals (median concentration, 0 copy/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that serum EBV DNA reflects tumoral EBER status and opens up the possibility that circulating EBV DNA may be used as a tumor marker for the EBER-positive gastric carcinomas. The biological and clinical significance of the presence of low levels of circulating EBV DNA in the minority of gastritispatients and healthy individuals remains to be elucidated.
Authors: M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Srishti Chakravorty; Bingyu Yan; Chong Wang; Luopin Wang; Joseph Taylor Quaid; Chin Fang Lin; Scott D Briggs; Joydeb Majumder; D Alejandro Canaria; Daniel Chauss; Gaurav Chopra; Matthew R Olson; Bo Zhao; Behdad Afzali; Majid Kazemian Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Julie L Ryan; Douglas R Morgan; Ricardo L Dominguez; Leigh B Thorne; Sandra H Elmore; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Jessica K Booker; Margaret L Gulley Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 5.662