Literature DB >> 11448822

Primary care compensation at an academic medical center: a model for the mixed-payer environment.

A J Sussman1, D G Fairchild, J Coblyn, T A Brennan.   

Abstract

The authors' academic medical center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, developed a primary care physician (PCP) salary incentive program for employed academic physicians. This program, first implemented in 1999, was needed to meet the financial imperatives placed on the institution by managed care and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997; its goal was to create a set of incentives for PCPs that is consistent with the mission of the academic center and helps motivate and reward PCP's work. The program sought to simultaneously increase productivity while optimizing resource utilization in a mixed-payer environment. The salary incentive program uses work relative-value units (wRVUs) as the measure of productivity. In addition to productivity-derived base pay, bonus incentives are added for efficient medical management, quality of care, teaching, and seniority. The authors report that there was significant concern from several members of the physician staff before the plan was implemented; they felt that the institution's PCPs were already operating at maximum clinical capacity. However, after the first year of operation of this plan, there was an overall 20% increase in PCP productivity. Increases were observed in all PCP subgroups when stratified by professional experience, clinical time commitment, and practice location. The authors conclude that the program has succeeded in giving incentives for academic PCPs to achieve under the growing demands for revenue self-sufficiency, managed care performance, quality of care, and academic commitment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448822     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200107000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Joerg J Meerpohl; Dany Raad; Giulia Piaggio; Manlio Mattioni; Marco G Paggi; Aymone Gurtner; Stefano Mattarocci; Rizwan Tahir; Paola Muti; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Benchmarks in clinical productivity: a national comprehensive cancer network survey.

Authors:  F Marc Stewart; Robert L Wasserman; Clara D Bloomfield; Stephen Petersdorf; Robert P Witherspoon; Frederick R Appelbaum; Andrew Ziskind; Brian McKenna; Jennifer M Dodson; Jane Weeks; William P Vaughan; Barry Storer; Sara Perkel; Marcy Waldinger
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: is there bias?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Bruce E Landon; John Z Ayanian; Catherine Borbas; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A new model for health care delivery.

Authors:  John P Kepros; Razvan C Opreanu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.