K R Aronson1, L F Barrett, K S Quigley. 1. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. keith.r.aronson@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS) purports to measure the extent to which individuals are sensitive to their bodies. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the SSAS in two studies with university students. METHODS: Participants completed the SSAS, various cross-sectional measures of somatic and psychological distress, longitudinal measures of somatic symptoms, daily hassles and mood, and participated in a heartbeat detection task (Study 2 only). RESULTS: The SSAS was correlated with cross-sectional measures of somatic symptom reporting, but not with somatic symptoms reported on a daily basis nor with an index of interoceptive sensitivity. The SSAS was also correlated with several indices of general distress including anxious and depressive symptoms, daily hassles, and negative emotionality. CONCLUSION: Taken together, the results suggest that the SSAS is more likely an index of negative emotionality and general distress than a valid measure of somatic sensitivity per se.
OBJECTIVE: The Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS) purports to measure the extent to which individuals are sensitive to their bodies. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the SSAS in two studies with university students. METHODS:Participants completed the SSAS, various cross-sectional measures of somatic and psychological distress, longitudinal measures of somatic symptoms, daily hassles and mood, and participated in a heartbeat detection task (Study 2 only). RESULTS: The SSAS was correlated with cross-sectional measures of somatic symptom reporting, but not with somatic symptoms reported on a daily basis nor with an index of interoceptive sensitivity. The SSAS was also correlated with several indices of general distress including anxious and depressive symptoms, daily hassles, and negative emotionality. CONCLUSION: Taken together, the results suggest that the SSAS is more likely an index of negative emotionality and general distress than a valid measure of somatic sensitivity per se.
Authors: Ellen L Poleshuck; Jennifer Katz; Carl H Andrus; Laura A Hogan; Beth F Jung; Dale I Kulick; Robert H Dworkin Journal: J Pain Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Sine Skovbjerg; Robert Zachariae; Alice Rasmussen; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Jesper Elberling Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: A Y Konijnenberg; C S P M Uiterwaal; J L L Kimpen; J van der Hoeven; J K Buitelaar; E R de Graeff-Meeder Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2005-05-17 Impact factor: 3.791