Literature DB >> 11448442

A prospective evaluation of dietary status and symptoms after near-total esophagectomy without gastric emptying procedure.

D J Ludwig1, R C Thirlby, D E Low.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After esophagectomy, the stomach is the most commonly utilized reconstructive conduit. There remains debate among surgeons regarding the requirements for pyloroplasty/pyloromyotomy following reconstruction. We present a series of patients having undergone near total esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric tube without gastric emptying procedure to analyze critically these patients' ability to reestablish a subjectively acceptable and nutritionally adequate eating pattern without significant side effects of early satiety, dumping, or diarrhea.
METHODS: Between 1991 and 1998, 48 patients underwent esophagectomy utilizing this technique and were available for long-term follow-up and nutritional assessment. Patient weights were recorded at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year and a telephone interview conducted at a mean of 36 months postoperatively for the evaluation of eating patterns and symptoms. A subgroup of these patients (32 of 48) completed a 3-day dietary record that was assessed by a certified nutritionist. This patient group included 10 patients (21%) who had received perioperative chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS: Dietary intake was characterized as normal or minimally limited in 41 patients (85%). Those who had received perioperative chemoradiotherapy needed no significant increased time to return to a normal dietary baseline (6.1 versus 5.9 months). Mean weight loss prior to surgery was 3 kg. Weight loss continued for the first 6 months (mean 10 kg); however, 63% were able to gain weight from 6 months to 1 year following surgery (mean 3 kg). Most patients were overweight prior to operation (mean 115% of ideal body weight) and achieved a new postoperative baseline (mean 104% of ideal body weight) at 1 year. Patients demonstrated a mean daily caloric intake of 2,179 kilocalories per day, which was 98% of recommended according to their ideal body weight. Postoperative symptoms of short-term nausea (19%), occasional dysphagia with certain foods (38%), mild increased stool frequency (15%), and occasional regurgitation (25%) were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Near-total esophagectomy with verticalized gastric tube without a gastric emptying procedure is well tolerated and allows a return to subjectively acceptable and nutritionally appropriate dietary eating pattern without significant associated side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448442     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00600-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

1.  An investigation into the current peri-operative nutritional management of oesophageal carcinoma patients in major carcinoma centres in England.

Authors:  P M Murphy; P Modi; J Rahamim; T Wheatley; S J Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Hanneke W J van Eden; Jelle P Ruurda; Misha D P Luyer; Elles Steenhagen; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Nutrient intake and contribution of home enteral nutrition to meeting nutritional requirements after oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy.

Authors:  M L Baker; V Halliday; P Robinson; K Smith; D J Bowrey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  S K H Wong; A C W Chan; D W H Lee; E W H To; E K W Ng; S C S Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Double tract-like gastric tube reconstruction decreases the incidences of delayed gastric emptying and bile reflux after esophagectomy: results of a pilot study of an experimental technique.

Authors:  Daisuke Fujimoto; Keizo Taniguchi; Junpei Takashima; Fumihiko Miura; Hirotoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  [Management of delayed complications after esophagectomy].

Authors:  A Beham; S Dango; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Presence and persistence of nutrition-related symptoms during the first year following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in clinically disease-free patients.

Authors:  E B Haverkort; J M Binnekade; O R C Busch; M I van Berge Henegouwen; R J de Haan; D J Gouma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Resting energy expenditure and nutritional status in patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Haruka Okamoto; Masaya Sasaki; Tomoko Johtatsu; Mika Kurihara; Hiromi Iwakawa; Michiya Akabane; Nobuo Hoshino; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Satoshi Murata; Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi; Tohru Tani; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.114

Review 9.  A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy.

Authors:  Melanie Baker; Vanessa Halliday; Robert N Williams; David J Bowrey
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 7.324

10.  Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David J Bowrey; Melanie Baker; Vanessa Halliday; Anne L Thomas; Ruth Pulikottil-Jacob; Karen Smith
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.