J van Os1, M Hanssen, R V Bijl, W Vollebergh. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, PO Box 616 (PAR 45), 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urban and rural populations have different rates of psychotic illness. If psychosis exists as a continuous phenotype in nature, urban-rural population differences in the rate of psychotic disorder should be accompanied by similar differences in the rate of abnormal mental states characterized by psychotic or psychosislike symptoms. METHODS: A random sample of 7076 individuals aged 18 to 64 years were interviewed by trained lay interviewers with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Approximately half of those with evidence of psychosis according to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview were additionally interviewed by clinicians. We investigated associations between a 5-level urbanicity rating and (1) any DSM-III-R diagnosis of psychotic disorder (sample prevalence, 1.5%), (2) any rating of hallucinations and/or delusions (sample prevalence, 4.2%), and (3) any rating of psychotic or psychosislike symptoms (sample prevalence, 17.5%). RESULTS: Level of urbanicity was associated not only with DSM-III-R psychotic disorder (adjusted odds ratio [OR] over 5 levels, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.72), but also, independently, with any rating of delusion and/or hallucination (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40; clinician-assessed psychotic symptoms only: OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03-1.64) and any rating of psychosislike symptom (adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24). Psychotic symptoms were strongly and independently associated with psychotic disorder, regardless of the level of urbanization. CONCLUSIONS: Community level of psychotic and psychosislike symptoms may be inextricably linked to the prevalence of psychotic disorder. The prevalence of abnormal mental states that facilitate development to overt psychotic illness increases progressively with level of urbanization.
BACKGROUND: Urban and rural populations have different rates of psychotic illness. If psychosis exists as a continuous phenotype in nature, urban-rural population differences in the rate of psychotic disorder should be accompanied by similar differences in the rate of abnormal mental states characterized by psychotic or psychosislike symptoms. METHODS: A random sample of 7076 individuals aged 18 to 64 years were interviewed by trained lay interviewers with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Approximately half of those with evidence of psychosis according to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview were additionally interviewed by clinicians. We investigated associations between a 5-level urbanicity rating and (1) any DSM-III-R diagnosis of psychotic disorder (sample prevalence, 1.5%), (2) any rating of hallucinations and/or delusions (sample prevalence, 4.2%), and (3) any rating of psychotic or psychosislike symptoms (sample prevalence, 17.5%). RESULTS: Level of urbanicity was associated not only with DSM-III-R psychotic disorder (adjusted odds ratio [OR] over 5 levels, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.72), but also, independently, with any rating of delusion and/or hallucination (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40; clinician-assessed psychotic symptoms only: OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03-1.64) and any rating of psychosislike symptom (adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24). Psychotic symptoms were strongly and independently associated with psychotic disorder, regardless of the level of urbanization. CONCLUSIONS: Community level of psychotic and psychosislike symptoms may be inextricably linked to the prevalence of psychotic disorder. The prevalence of abnormal mental states that facilitate development to overt psychotic illness increases progressively with level of urbanization.
Authors: M Heinimaa; R K R Salokangas; T Ristkari; M Plathin; J Huttunen; T Ilonen; T Suomela; J Korkeila; T H McGlashan Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Helen Krstev; Steve Carbone; Susy M Harrigan; Christina Curry; Kathryn Elkins; Patrick D McGorry Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Howard Birnbaum; Olga Demler; Ian R H Falloon; Elizabeth Gagnon; Margaret Guyer; Mary J Howes; Kenneth S Kendler; Lizheng Shi; Ellen Walters; Eric Q Wu Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Daisuke Fukudome; Lindsay N Hayes; Travis E Faust; Catherine A Foss; Mari A Kondo; Brian J Lee; Atsushi Saito; Shin-Ichi Kano; Jennifer M Coughlin; Atsushi Kamiya; Martin G Pomper; Akira Sawa; Minae Niwa Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mart L J M Eussen; Esther I de Bruin; Arthur R Van Gool; Anneke Louwerse; Jan van der Ende; Fop Verheij; Frank C Verhulst; Kirstin Greaves-Lord Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 4.785