Literature DB >> 11448321

Comparison of the ocular hypotensive lipid AGN 192024 with timolol: dosing, efficacy, and safety evaluation of a novel compound for glaucoma management.

R A Laibovitz1, A M VanDenburgh, C Felix, R David, A Batoosingh, A Rosenthal, J Cheetham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of the ocular hypotensive lipid AGN 192024 (Lumigan) with those of timolol.
METHODS: A 30-day, randomized, investigator-masked, clinical trial involving 100 patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Study medications were instilled topically. Doses of 0.003%, 0.01%, or 0.03% AGN 192024 were given once daily for 3 weeks then twice daily for 1 week, and vehicle control or 0.5% timolol was given twice daily for 4 weeks. Mean change in IOP from baseline was the primary efficacy variable. Safety parameters included adverse events, hyperemia grading, laser flare meter analysis, heart rate, and blood pressure.
RESULTS: Timolol and all 3 concentrations of AGN 192024 lowered IOP from baseline (P < .001). A dosage of 0.03% AGN 192024 once daily lowered IOP significantly more than timolol (P < or = .02) at every study visit except day 21 (P = .053) and provided better diurnal IOP control. Twice-daily dosing of AGN 192024 provided no clinically significant benefit over once-daily dosing. All treatment regimens were safe and well tolerated, with no clinically significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure and no between-group differences in the incidence of adverse events. The only significant ocular safety finding with AGN 192024 was a dose-related mild increase in conjunctival hyperemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the 3 concentrations tested, 0.03% AGN 192024 once daily had the best therapeutic profile. AGN 192024 was safe and well tolerated, and it provided superior ocular hypotensive efficacy and diurnal IOP control compared with timolol in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448321     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  15 in total

1.  A randomised, double masked, multicentre clinical trial comparing bimatoprost and timolol for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  S M Whitcup; L B Cantor; A M VanDenburgh; K Chen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Topical bimatoprost: a review of its use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Stephanie E Easthope; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  A 6-month randomized clinical trial of bimatoprost 0.03% versus the association of timolol 0.5% and latanoprost 0.005% in glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Manni; Marco Centofanti; Mariacristina Parravano; Francesco Oddone; Massimo G Bucci
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  First-line treatment for elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) associated with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: focus on bimatoprost.

Authors:  Simon K Law
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09

5.  Bimatoprost in the treatment of eyelash hypotrichosis.

Authors:  Simon K Law
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-26

6.  Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Anne J Lee; Peter McCluskey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-30

Review 7.  Prostamides (prostaglandin-ethanolamides) and their pharmacology.

Authors:  D F Woodward; Y Liang; A H-P Krauss
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Effect of bimatoprost on ocular circulation in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Cengiz Akarsu; Sevda Yilmaz; Pelin Taner; Ahmet Ergin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  A randomized, controlled comparison of macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia in patients treated with bimatoprost 0.01% or vehicle who were previously controlled on latanoprost.

Authors:  E Randy Craven; Ching-Chi Liu; Amy Batoosingh; Rhett M Schiffman; Scott M Whitcup
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12-06

10.  Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: a patient-use study.

Authors:  Mauricio D Paolera; Niro Kasahara; Cristiano C Umbelino; John G Walt
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.